Table 2 Mixed-effects meta-regression of mental disorder PRS effects on social-behavioural symptoms.

From: Polygenic risk for mental disorder reveals distinct association profiles across social behaviour in the general population

  

Non-adjusted for cross-disorder effects

Adjusted for cross-disorder effects

 

Parameter

 

θ (SE)

Z-value

P-value

 

θ (SE)

Z-value

P-value

ADHD-PRS

 

R2 = 0.88

   

R2 = 0.83

   
 

Intercept (Age 4, parent-reported, low prosociality)

 

−0.015 (0.010)

−1.49

0.14

 

−0.017 (0.011)

−1.50

0.13

 

Age (Centred at 4 years)

 

0.0025 (0.00089)

2.86

0.0042

 

0.002 (0.001)

1.96

0.05

 

Reporter (Teacher-reported)

 

0.044 (0.0085)

5.16

2.5 × 10−7

 

0.046 (0.0083)

5.56

2.6 × 10−8

 

Trait (Peer problems)

 

0.03 (0.0089)

3.38

7.3 × 10−4

 

0.03 (0.0058)

5.20

2.0×10−7

ASD-PRS

 

R2 = 0.58

   

R2 = 0.67

   
 

Intercept (Low prosociality)

 

0.021 (0.0063)

3.36

7.7 × 10−4

 

0.017 (0.0049)

3.49

4.8 × 10−4

 

Trait (Peer problems)

 

0.037 (0.0083)

4.47

7.9 × 10−6

 

0.025 (0.0054)

4.51

6.3 × 10−6

BP-PRS

 

R2 = 0.00

   

R2 = 0.00

   
 

Intercept

 

0.0054 (0.0056)

0.98

0.33

 

0.00056 (0.0054)

0.10

0.92

MD-PRS

 

R2 = 0.84

   

R2 = 0.81

   
 

Intercept (Age 4, low prosociality)

 

−0.018 (0.011)

−1.66

0.096

 

−0.021 (0.012)

−1.68

0.09

 

Age (Centred at 4 years)

 

0.0035 (0.00095)

3.74

1.9 × 10−4

 

0.0027 (0.0011)

2.38

0.02

 

Trait (Peer problems)

 

0.048 (0.0093)

5.14

2.8 × 10−7

 

0.051 (0.0068)

7.46

8.8 × 10−14

Schizophrenia-PRS

 

R2 = 0.45

   

R2 = 0.70

   
 

Intercept (Age 4, low prosociality)

 

0.017 (0.011)

1.55

0.12

 

0.026 (0.014)

1.91

0.06

 

Age (Centred at 4 years)

 

0.0018 (0.00096)

1.86

0.063

 

0.0013 (0.0013)

0.99

0.32

 

Trait (Peer problems)

 

−0.027 (0.0094)

−2.94

0.0033

 

−0.043 (0.0076)

−5.72

1.1 × 10−8

  1. PRS(C + T) association effects for ADHD, ASD, BP, MD and schizophrenia risk on social behaviour (negative binominal model) were combined across 29 social symptoms (14 ALSPAC-based + 15 TEDS-based; at PT ≤ 0.1) for each disorder using mixed-effects meta-regressions, accounting for phenotypic correlations between social scores. Here, the most parsimonious models are shown with fixed effect predictors (θ) of PRS effect heterogeneity including age- (centred at 4 years), reporter- (parent versus teacher reports), and trait-specific differences in social behaviour (low prosociality versus peer problems). The most parsimonious model for each disorder was identified using meta-regression combining univariate PRS effects that were non-adjusted for cross-disorder PRS effects. For comparison, corresponding estimates are given here for meta-regressions combining univariate PRS effects that were adjusted for cross-disorder PRS effects. R2 is defined as the ratio of explained variance to total variance in univariate PRS effects β.
  2. ADHD Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, ALSPAC Avon Longitudinal study of Parents and Children, ASD Autism spectrum disorder, BP Bipolar disorder, C+T clumping and thresholding, MD Major depression, PRS Polygenic risk scores, PT PRS threshold, TEDS Twins Early Development Study.
  3. Multiple-testing corrected P-value: P ≤ 0.01.