Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Effect of caffeine and cannabidiol (CBD) co-administration on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) subjective effects, performance impairment, and pharmacokinetics

Abstract

Cannabis products premixed with caffeine are increasingly present in the United States marketplace. Despite emergence of this product class, no human laboratory data have directly evaluated the isolated impact of caffeine on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) effects as well as additional impacts of other common co-administered cannabinoids. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, within-subject crossover study evaluated potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between/among Δ9-THC, caffeine, and cannabidiol (CBD). Participants (N = 20; 10 men/10 women) completed outpatient laboratory sessions in which oral Δ9-THC (7.5 mg cumulative), caffeine (180 mg cumulative), and/or CBD (105 mg cumulative) were co-administered in a cumulative dosing design. Primary outcomes included subjective effects indicative of abuse liability (e.g., drug high), performance effects that underlie safety risk (e.g., simulated driving), and plasma cannabinoid/caffeine concentrations. Caffeine co-administration produced minimal changes in Δ9-THC-induced subjective effects, performance, or metabolism, although signals for perceived driving impairment were observed. In contrast, CBD, when co-administered with Δ9-THC and caffeine increased outcomes associated with abuse liability (e.g., drug high, p = 0.002) and performance impairment versus Δ9-THC alone. CBD also increased plasma Δ9-THC (p = 0.004) and 11-OH-Δ9-THC (p < 0.001) concentrations compared with dose conditions without CBD co-administration. These data provide the first direct assessment of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of Δ9-THC and caffeine when co-administered in humans. The robust alteration of Δ9-THC-induced effects and Δ9-THC pharmacokinetics by CBD further emphasizes the importance of considering full cannabinoid profiles. Broadly, these data highlight the importance of considering drug combinations and interactions in future cannabis regulatory decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Timecourse and peak effects for subjective effects.
Fig. 2: Timecourse and peak effects for performance effects.
Fig. 3: Timecourse and peak effects (Cmax) for plasma Δ9-THC and metabolites.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and source code for analysis are available upon request.

References

  1. Business Insider. I tried one of the first caffeinated cannabis drinks, and it gave me a giddy buzz. 2021. https://www.businessinsider.com/i-drank-caffeinated-cannabis-seltzer-was-perfect-for-going-out-2021-8.

  2. Panlilio LV, Ferré S, Yasar S, Thorndike EB, Schindler CW, Goldberg SR. Combined effects of THC and caffeine on working memory in rats. Br J Pharm. 2012;165:2529–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Justinová Z, Ferré S, Redhi GH, Mascia P, Stroik J, Quarta D, et al. Reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists, but not cocaine, are altered by an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist. Addiction Biol. 2011;16:405–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferré S, Lluís C, Justinova Z, Quiroz C, Orru M, Navarro G, et al. Adenosine–cannabinoid receptor interactions. Implications for striatal function. Br J Pharm. 2010;160:443–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira S, Gonçalves F, Marques J, Tomé ÂR, Rodrigues R, Nunes-Correia I, et al. Presynaptic adenosine A2A receptors dampen cannabinoid CB 1 receptor-mediated inhibition of corticostriatal glutamatergic transmission. Br J Pharm. 2015;172:1074–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tebano MT, Martire A, Popoli P. Adenosine A2A–cannabinoid CB1 receptor interaction: an integrative mechanism in striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission. Brain Res. 2012;1476:108–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno E, Chiarlone A, Medrano M, Puigdellívol M, Bibic L, Howell LA, et al. Singular location and signaling profile of adenosine A2A-cannabinoid CB1 receptor heteromers in the dorsal striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:964–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thai C, Tayo B, Critchley D. A phase 1 open-label, fixed-sequence pharmacokinetic drug interaction trial to investigate the effect of cannabidiol on the CYP1A2 Probe caffeine in healthy subjects. Clin Pharm Drug Dev. 2021;10:1279–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferretti ML, Gustin ND, Sokol CM, Zamarripa CA, Feldner MT, Bonn-Miller MO, et al. A preliminary investigation of the simultaneous effects of cannabidiol and caffeine. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024;32:475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bansal S, Zamarripa CA, Spindle TR, Weerts EM, Thummel KE, Vandrey R, et al. Evaluation of cytochrome P450-mediated cannabinoid-drug interactions in healthy adult participants. Clin Pharm Therapeutics. 2023;114:693–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zamarripa CA, Spindle TR, Surujunarain R, Weerts EM, Bansal S, Unadkat JD, et al. Assessment of orally administered Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol when coadministered with cannabidiol on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2254752–e52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Christians U, Schmitz V, Haschke M. Functional interactions between P-glycoprotein and CYP3A in drug metabolism. Expert Opin drug Metab Toxicol. 2005;1:641–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu H-J, Wang J-S, Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, Gibson BB, Gefroh HA, et al. Characterization of P-glycoprotein inhibition by major cannabinoids from marijuana. J Pharm Exp Therapeutics. 2006;317:850–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Food and Drug Administration. Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs. (Food and Drug Administration, 2017).

  15. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene, R. E. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Test Manual). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.

  16. Reynolds CR. Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1997;12:29–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McLeod DR, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J. An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test. Behav Res Methods Instrum. 1982;14:463–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spindle TR, Martin EL, Grabenauer M, Woodward T, Milburn MA, Vandrey R. Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective effects, and blood THC concentrations following acute administration of oral and vaporized cannabis. J Psychopharmacol. 2021;35:786–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Wood KM, Lonero L, Clinton KM, Johnson AG. On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation. J Saf Res. 2011;42:267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zamarripa CA, Novak MD, Weerts EM, Vandrey R, Spindle TR. The effects of oral and vaporized cannabis alone, and in combination with alcohol, on driving performance using the STISIM driving simulator: a two-part, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover clinical laboratory protocol. Front Pharm. 2022;13:964749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sempio C, Almaraz-Quinones N, Jackson M, Zhao W, Wang GS, Liu Y, et al. Simultaneous quantification of 17 cannabinoids by LC–MS-MS in human plasma. J Anal Toxicol. 2022;46:383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorbenko AA, Heuberger JA, Klumpers LE, de Kam ML, Strugala PK, de Visser SJ, et al. Cannabidiol increases psychotropic effects and plasma concentrations of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol without improving its analgesic properties. Clin Pharm Therapeutics. 2024;116:1289–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chesney E, Oliver D, Sarma A, Lamper AD, Slimani I, Lloyd M, et al. Does cannabidiol reduce the adverse effects of cannabis in schizophrenia? A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02175-3. Epub ahead of print.

  25. Lo LA, Christiansen AL, Strickland JC, Pistawka CA, Eadie L, Vandrey R, et al. Does acute cannabidiol (CBD) use impair performance? A meta-analysis and comparison with placebo and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49:1425–36.

  26. Lo LA, Christiansen A, Eadie L, Strickland JC, Kim DD, Boivin M, et al. Cannabidiol-associated hepatotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med. 2023;293:724–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marczinski CA, Fillmore MT. Energy drinks mixed with alcohol: what are the risks?. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:98–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McKetin R, Coen A, Kaye S. A comprehensive review of the effects of mixing caffeinated energy drinks with alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;151:15–30.

Download references

Funding

Support for this study was provided by a research contract from Canopy Growth Corporation and professional development funds from Johns Hopkins University. Canopy Growth Corporation had no direct role in data collection, analysis, or restrictions on publishing of data generated during the conduct of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JCS, RV, CAZ, TRS, DL, CLB, MTF, JGI, and MOBM contributed to study design. JCS, HET, NMP, and DW contributed to study oversight and data collection. JK, CS, JCP, and UC contributed to pharmacokinetic analysis. JCS and CAZ contributed to data analysis. JCS drafted the initial manuscript with critical feedback from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin C. Strickland.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

JCS has received research related funding from Canopy Growth Corporation and DynamiCare Health and consulting fees from Realm of Caring Foundation and Merck Corporation in the past three years. TRS has received research funding from Cultivate Biologics and consulting fees from Canopy Growth in the past three years. MOBM is employed by Charlotte’s Web, serves as a board member of DeFloria, and is a past employee of Canopy Growth Corporation. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strickland, J.C., Tilton, H.E., Patton, N.M. et al. Effect of caffeine and cannabidiol (CBD) co-administration on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) subjective effects, performance impairment, and pharmacokinetics. Neuropsychopharmacol. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02232-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02232-x

Search

Quick links