Table 3 Significant results of the multiple linear regression models for cognitive (3a) and psychosocial functions (3b) as dependent variables.
(3a) Processing speed at T2 (n = 54) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Reference category | B (95% CI) | SE | T | p |
Intercept | – | 50.73 (20.30, 81.17) | 15.12 | 3.36 | 0.002* |
Age at T1 | – | 1.61 (0.26, 2.96) | 0.67 | 2.41 | 0.020* |
Sex: Male | Female | 5.78 (−2.06, 13.62) | 3.89 | 1.49 | 0.144 |
CNS involvement of cancer: Yes | No | −4.34 (−16.15, 7.48) | 5.87 | −0.74 | 0.464 |
Treatment modality: | Chemotherapy only | 1.77 (−8.76, 12.30) | 5.23 | 0.34 | 0.736 |
Surgery only | |||||
Treatment modality: | Chemotherapy only | −1.39 (−11.74, 8.97) | 5.14 | −0.27 | 0.788 |
Combinationa | |||||
Processing speed at T1 | – | 0.34 (0.07, 0.61) | 0.13 | 2.51 | 0.016* |
(3b) Peer problems at T2b (n = 31) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Reference category | B (95% CI) | SE | T | p |
Intercept | – | −0.22 (−2.37, 1.94) | 1.04 | −0.21 | 0.838 |
Age at T1 | – | 0.06 (−0.23, 0.35) | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.676 |
Sex: Male | Female | 1.21 (0.02, 2.39) | 0.57 | 2.10 | 0.046* |
CNS involvement of cancer: Yes | No | −0.21 (−1.58, 1.16) | 0.66 | −0.32 | 0.754 |
Treatment modality: | Chemotherapy only | −0.14 (−1.31, 1.03) | 0.57 | −0.25 | 0.809 |
Surgery only | |||||
Treatment modality: | Chemotherapy only | −0.58 (−1.87, 0.72) | 0.63 | −0.92 | 0.366 |
Combinationc | |||||
Peer problems at T1a | – | 0.58 (0.23, 0.94) | 0.17 | 3.39 | 0.002* |