Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Transforming pediatric healthcare: a decade of innovation in global hospitals (2015–2024)

Abstract

Background

As pediatric hospitals continue to grow in innovation, it is important to create a standardized metric to measure this growth and create a network to encourage further innovation. We worked to classify all pediatric hospitals on a scale of innovation with the goal of encouraging collaboration that can lead to more overall innovation.

Methods

All pediatric hospitals worldwide were ranked on a scale of innovation from 1 to 3, with 1 being the most innovative, or “established,” and 3 being the least innovative, or “nascent.” This scale is based on information found on the hospital’s website or in articles about the hospital with regards to their innovation. These hospitals were ranked in 2015, 2020, and between 2023 and 2024 among five different raters.

Results

The number of worldwide hospitals in each category of innovation was evaluated in 2015, 2020, and 2023–2024. Between 2015 and 2024, there was a 48% decrease in the number of “nascent” hospitals, a 4.5% increase in “emerging” hospitals, and a 120% increase in “established” hospitals.

Conclusion

The changes that hospitals have undergone in their respective categories of innovation over the past nine years suggest an overall increase in innovation.

Impact

  • Pediatric hospitals worldwide have become more innovative over the past decade, but there is very limited literature that has assessed this trajectory at a broad level.

  • Creating a standardized metric of innovation can promote a culture that enables less innovative hospitals to collaborate with their more innovative counterparts

  • This metric of innovation is the first that we’ve seen in the literature that assesses all pediatric hospitals on a scale of innovation and tracks their progress over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Riskin, D. J., Longaker, M. T. & Krummel, T. M. The ethics of innovation in pediatric surgery. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 15, 319–323 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dearing, J. W. & Cox, J. G. Diffusion of Innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Aff. 37, 183–190 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kotagal, U. R., Compton-Phillips, A. How Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center built a culture focused on broad-based change that is transformational for children and their families. NEJM Catalyst. (2017).

  4. Hall, M. J. et al. Innovations in pediatric prosthetics. J. Pediatr. Orthop. Soc. North Am. 3, 221 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez-Ferro, M. International innovations in pediatric minimally invasive surgery: the Argentine experience. J. Pediatr. Surg. 47, 825–835 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rascon, J. et al. Twinning to reduce research and innovation inequalities in paediatric solid tumours across Europe. EJC Paediatr. Oncol. 3, 100153 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, G. D., Kraus, S., Srivastava, M., Chopra, R. & Kallmuenzer, A. The changing role of innovation for crisis management in times of COVID-19: an integrative literature review. J. Innov. Knowl. 7, 100281 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marques de Valois Lanzarin, C. et al. Teleconsultations at a pediatrics outpatient service in COVID-19 pandemic: first results. Telemed. e-Health 27, 1311–1316 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Więckowska, B., Byszek, K. & Malenda, M. The Children’s Hospital of the future: a vision that meets all needs. HERD 15, 301–314 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aylward, B. S. et al. An introduction to artificial intelligence in developmental and behavioral pediatrics. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 44, e126–e134 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohr, A. & Memarzadeh, K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. Artif. Intell. Healthc. 25–60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2.

  12. Marx, A. et al. Department of pediatrics chair’s initiatives: promoting innovation and improvement through collaboration, accountability, and faculty development. J. Pediatr. 161, 377–378.e1 (2012).

  13. Krelle, H., Martinez, M., Garry, K. & Horwitz, L. I. Perceptions of factors associated with sustainability of health care innovation centers. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2339129 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyren, A., Coffey, M., Shepherd, M., Lashutka, N. & Muething, S. We will not compete on safety: how children’s hospitals have come together to hasten harm reduction. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 44, 377–388 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alten, J. et al. Preventing cardiac arrest in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit through multicenter collaboration. JAMA Pediatr. 176, 1027–1036 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author has met the authorship requirements listed in Pediatric Research: Anjali Alamshaw: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Vivian Nguyen: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Jasmin Joshi: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Amber Osorno: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. Hana Baig: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. Anthony Chang: Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Alamshaw.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alamshaw, A., Nguyen, V., Joshi, J. et al. Transforming pediatric healthcare: a decade of innovation in global hospitals (2015–2024). Pediatr Res 98, 49–51 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03697-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03697-0

Search

Quick links