Table 2 Metric outcome parameters.

From: Confirmation of successful supraglottic airway device placement in neonates using a respiratory function monitor

  

leakage %

pVTe %

VTemean ml/kg

PIP cmH2O

rate vent/min

attempts number

durationa seconds

 

patient 1

before placement

93.25

0.00

1.69

27.34

26.21

4

16 (79)

RFM hidden

after placement

5.08

35

8.18

21.78

32.95

patient 2

after placement

56.29

29.37

3.68

17.19

34.44

2

12 (29)

patient 3

before adaptationsb

75.57

100

5.90

17.10

22.17

1

12

RFM visible

after adaptationsb

18.83

92

6.05

13.11

21.2

patient 4

before adaptationsb

49.13

0.00

1.04

25.31

40.71

1

19

after adaptationsb

16.42

39.4

7.67

27.82

35.86

patient 5

before adaptationsb

31.22

0.00

1.35

20.23

34.83

1

31

after adaptationsb

28.61

72.73

4.88

19.78

29.79

patient 6

after placement

7.26

66.7

5.92

23.77

24.61

1

20

  1. pVTe tidal volume percentage in range, VTe tidal volume, PIP peak inspiratory pressure,
  2. aat successful attempt (total, i.e. all attempts summated)
  3. badaptations (repositioning/direction, deeper insertion) based on RFM data.
Back to article page