Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Research Article
  • Published:

Paternal perinatal intimate partner violence victimization and child abuse

Abstract

Background

Perinatal intimate partner violence (IPV) poses significant health risks for victims and their children. While maternal IPV victimization has been extensively studied, research on paternal IPV victimization remains limited. This study examines the prevalence of paternal perinatal IPV victimization and its association with child abuse and paternal psychological distress.

Methods

We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1248 postnatal fathers whose partners had given birth within 1 year in August 2021. IPV victimization was assessed across physical, psychological, economic, and sexual abuse subtypes. Outcomes included child abuse (physical, psychological, neglect, or any abuse) and paternal psychological distress. Modified Poisson regression was used to compute risk ratios (RR).

Results

Among fathers surveyed, 13.6% reported IPV victimization. Paternal IPV was associated with increased risk of child abuse, including physical (RR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.33–3.14), psychological (RR 2.08; 95% CI, 1.52–2.84), neglect (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.70–5.66), and any abuse (RR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.50–2.61).

Conclusions

Paternal perinatal IPV victimization is a significant public health concern associated with an increased risk of child abuse and psychological distress. These findings highlight the importance of considering fathers in IPV-related research and suggest the need for further study on inclusive approaches to family violence prevention.

Impact

  • Perinatal IPV victimization leads to adverse health outcomes for both victims and their children.

  • Our study found that 14% of postnatal fathers experienced perinatal IPV victimization, highlighting its prevalence.

  • Paternal perinatal IPV victimization is associated with an increased risk of child abuse within the household.

  • Additionally, paternal IPV victimization is linked to higher levels of paternal psychological distress.

  • These findings highlight the need for targeted support for affected fathers to protect child well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, E.O., upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Alhusen, J. L., Ray, E., Sharps, P. & Bullock, L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J. Women’s Health 24, 100–106 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paulson, J. L. Intimate partner violence and perinatal post-traumatic stress and depression symptoms: a systematic review of findings in longitudinal studies. Trauma Violence Abus. 23, 733–747 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Palladino, C. L., Singh, V., Campbell, J., Flynn, H. & Gold, K. J. Homicide and suicide during the perinatal period: findings from the national violent death reporting system. Obstet. Gynecol. 118, 1056–1063 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiesa, A. E. et al. Intimate partner violence victimization and parenting: a systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 80, 285–300 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelleher, K. J. et al. Self-reported disciplinary practices among women in the child welfare system: association with domestic violence victimization. Child Abuse Negl. 32, 811–818 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lannert, B. K. et al. Relational trauma in the context of intimate partner violence. Child Abuse Negl. 38, 1966–1975 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor, C. A., Guterman, N. B., Lee, S. J. & Rathouz, P. J. Intimate partner violence, maternal stress, nativity, and risk for maternal maltreatment of young children. Am. J. Public Health 99, 175–183 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Casanueva, C. E. & Martin, S. L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and mothers’ child abuse potential. J. Interpers. Violence 22, 603–622 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, J. J., Theodore, A. D., Martin, S. L. & Runyan, D. K. Psychological abuse between parents: associations with child maltreatment from a population-based sample. Child Abus. Negl. 32, 819–829 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coohey, C. Battered mothers who physically abuse their children. J. Interpers. Violence 19, 943–952 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gustafsson, H. C. et al. Family violence and children’s behavior problems: independent contributions of intimate partner and child-directed physical aggression. J. Fam. Violence 29, 773–781 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. Creating a Process of Change for Men Who Batter: An Education Curriculum. Duluth, MN: Domestic Abuse Intervention Project (2003).

  13. Schwartz, M. D. & DeKeseredy, W. S. Interpersonal violence against women: the role of men. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 24, 178–185 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Archer, J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 126, 651–680 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Breiding, M. J. et al. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization-national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 63, 1–18 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K. & Shortt, J. W. Observed initiation and reciprocity of physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. J. Fam. Violence 22, 101–111 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dutton, D. G., Nicholls, T. L. & Spidel, A. in Women Who Perpetrate Relationship Violence 1–31 (Routledge, 2014).

  18. Straus, M. A. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 30, 252–275 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leemis, R. W. et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Intimate Partner Violence. (2022).

  20. Lysova, A. & Dim, E. E. Severity of victimization and formal help seeking among men who experienced intimate partner violence in their ongoing relationships. J. Interpers. Violence 37, 1404–1429 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor, J. C., Bates, E. A., Colosi, A. & Creer, A. J. Barriers to men’s help seeking for intimate partner violence. J. Interpers. Violence 37, Np18417–np18444 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Terada, S., Fujiwara, T., Obikane, E. & Tabuchi, T. Association of paternity leave with impaired father-infant bonding: findings from a nationwide online survey in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 4251 (2022).

  23. Isumi, A., Fujiwara, T., Nawa, N., Ochi, M. & Kato, T. Mediating effects of parental psychological distress and individual-level social capital on the association between child poverty and maltreatment in Japan. Child Abus. Negl. 83, 142–150 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Furukawa, T. A. et al. The performance of the japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 17, 152–158 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakurai, K., Nishi, A., Kondo, K., Yanagida, K. & Kawakami, N. Screening performance of K6/K10 and other screening instruments for mood and anxiety disorders in Japan. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 65, 434–441 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kessler, R. C. et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol. Med 32, 959–976 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujiwara, T. Impact of adverse childhood experience on physical and mental health: a life-course epidemiology perspective. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 76, 544–551 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnakumar, A. & Buehler, C. Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Fam. Relat. 49, 25–44 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Erel, O. & Burman, B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 118, 108–132 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lannert, B. K., Levendosky, A. A. & Bogat, G. A. The interaction of maternal personality traits and intimate partner violence as influences on maternal representations. Infant Ment. Health J. 34, 222–233 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Obikane, E., Nishi, D., Morisaki, N. & Tabuchi, T. Risk factors of paternal perinatal depression during the Covid-19 pandemic in Japan. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 44, 2245556 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kiely, M., El-Mohandes, A. A. E., El-Khorazaty, M. N. & Gantz, M. G. An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 115, 273–283 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bair-Merritt, M., Zuckerman, B., Augustyn, M. & Cronholm, P. F. Silent victims-an epidemic of childhood exposure to domestic violence. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1673–1675 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharps, P. W. et al. Domestic violence enhanced perinatal home visits: the Dove randomized clinical trial. J. Women’s Health 25, 1129–1138 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants for their time and engagement in the JACSIS study.

Funding

The work is funded by Ready for COVID-19 Relief Fund [grant number: 5th period 2nd term 001]; the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHIKAKENHI Grants, [grant number: 21H04856; 23K16345; 21K21131]; the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants [grant number: 23DA0701].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.O. conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the statistical analysis, and drafted the initial manuscript. D.N. and T.T. conceptualized and designed the study. All authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika Obikane.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.N. reports personal fees outside of the submitted work from Startia, Inc., MD.net, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. Other authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study is approved by the Osaka International Cancer Institute’s Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 20084) and the Research Ethics Committee of the Graduate School of Medicine/Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo (approval number: 2020336NI).

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained electronically from all participants included in this study. Participants were provided with detailed information regarding the study’s purpose, procedures, potential risks, and confidentiality measures before giving their consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obikane, E., Nishi, D., Kato, T. et al. Paternal perinatal intimate partner violence victimization and child abuse. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04296-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04296-3

Search

Quick links