Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Special Article
  • Published:

Transforming academic medicine through social media: why isn’t it working for me?

Abstract

Physicians significantly underutilize social media despite its potential for global medical communication and public education. Purposeful use of social media—with strategic content, optimized timing, and platform-specific approaches—can dramatically improve research dissemination and clinical influence. We outline challenges introduced by the shift from chronological timelines to algorithm-driven content delivery, which prioritizes engagement over evidence. These changes reduce the visibility of traditional scientific content. Our research confirms that posts with broad public appeal consistently generate higher engagement than narrow academic discussions. We present evidence-based case studies, including COVID-19 social media campaigns that reached over 4 million impressions per month and influenced public policy. We also highlight best practices for educational videos. Finally, we illustrate how online collaborations between researchers and families can improve clinical practice using the example of families of children with trisomy 18. Effective social media engagement requires visual abstracts, short videos, and simplified messages tailored for algorithms. Medical hashtags, strategic timing, and collaborations with ethical influencers can further enhance reach. When used ethically and strategically, social media becomes a transformative tool—combating misinformation, informing the public, and supporting professional advancement. For physicians in all specialties, social media literacy is becoming an essential skill for modern healthcare communication.

Impact

  • Strategic use of social media empowers physicians to disseminate evidence-based research amidst misinformation and algorithmic bias.

  • This article provides a practical framework for optimizing academic engagement online, bridging the gap between digital reach and academic scholarly recognition.

  • Effective digital scholarship legitimizes science. It is essential to uphold credibility, influence public discourse, and support informed clinical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roland, D. Social media and the digital health arena. Future Healthc. J. 4, 184–188 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dyson, M. P. et al. Social Media for the Dissemination of Cochrane Child Health Evidence: Evaluation Study. J. Med Internet Res. 19, e308 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hameed, I. et al. Analysis of Physician Use of Social Media. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2118213 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Metzler, H. & Garcia, D. Social drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 19, 735–748 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, T., Trueger, N. S., Roland, D. & Thoma, B. Evidence-based medicine in the era of social media: scholarly engagement through participation and online interaction. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 20, 3–8 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parsi, K. & Elster, N. Why Can’t We Be Friends? A Case-Based Analysis of Ethical Issues with Social Media in Health Care. AMA J. Ethics 17, 1009–1018 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roland, D. & Brazil, V. Top 10 ways to reconcile social media and ‘traditional’ education in emergency care. Emerg. Med. J. 32, 819–822 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nash, E., Bickerstaff, M., Chetwynd, A. J., Hawcutt, D. B. & Oni, L. The readability of parent information leaflets in paediatric studies. Pediatr. Res. 94, 1166–1171 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Albrecht, S. S. et al. Lessons Learned From Dear Pandemic, a Social Media–Based Science Communication Project Targeting the COVID-19 Infodemic. Public Health Rep. 137, 449–456 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Habibi, S. A. & Salim, L. Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: a critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. PloS One 16, e0248507 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leong, C. M. et al. Social Media–Delivered Patient Education to Enhance Self-management and Attitudes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e31449 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Janvier, A., Farlow, B. & Wilfond, B. S. The experience of families with children with trisomy 13 and 18 in social networks. Pediatrics 130, 293–298 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams, S. Y., Tucker, R. & Lechner, B. E. The new normal: parental use of online health communities in the NICU. Pediatr. Res. 91, 1827–1833 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrington, K. “Our children are not a diagnosis” – what an amazing response! Neonatal Res. (blog), July 26, 2012. Available from: https://neonatalresearch.org/2012/07/26/our-children-are-not-a-diagnosis-what-an-amazing-response/ (accessed June 10, 2025).

  15. Crestodina, A. The social media rule of thirds and 3 best practices for social media management. Orbit Media (blog), published ~May 2021. Available from: https://www.orbitmedia.com/blog/social-media-rule-of-thirds/ (accessed June 10, 2025).

  16. Ibrahim, A. M. Improving the performance of research journals: lessons learned from the visual abstract. Sci. Ed. 47, 43–46 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Comp, G. Dyer, S. Gottlieb, M. Is TikTok the next social media frontier for medicine? AEM Educ Train. 5, https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10532 (2020)

  18. Chaudhry, A., Glodé, L. M., Gillman, M. & Miller, R. S. Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, 2010 and 2011. J. Oncol. Pr. 8, 173–178 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tapper, E. B., Mirabella, R., Walicki, J. J. & Banales, J. M. Optimizing the use of Twitter for research dissemination: the “Three Facts and a Story” randomized-controlled trial. J. Hepatol. 75, 271–274 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhn, T. Using the AIDA language to formally organize scientific claims. In Controlled Natural Language: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop, CNL 2018 (eds Davis B., Wyner A., Keet C. M.) 304, 52–60 (IOS Press, 2018).

  21. Hadeed, J. Social Media Focus: How often (and when) should you post? Am Soc Plast Surg (blog), March 2, 2019. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/publications/psn-extra/news/social-media-focus-how-often-and-when-should-you-post/ (accessed June 10 2025).

  22. Volodina, K. 12 tools to plan and schedule social media posts for free. Planable (blog), May 8, 2025. Available from: https://planable.io/blog/schedule-social-media-posts/ (accessed June 10 2025).

  23. Lord E. Healthcare content marketing: 2025 observances. Geonetric (blog); December 26, 2024. Available from: https://www.geonetric.com/general/2025-observances-to-incorporate-into-your-healthcare-content-marketing/ (accessed June 10 2025).

  24. Powwow Events. How to leverage social media during healthcare conferences. Powwow Event (blog), October 4 2024. Available from: https://www.powwowevent.com/how-to-leverage-social-media-during-healthcare-conferences (accessed June 10 2025).

  25. Santarone, K., Boneva, D., McKenney, M. & Elkbuli, A. Hashtags in healthcare: understanding Twitter hashtags and online engagement at the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 2016–2019 meetings. Trauma Surg. Acute Care Open 5, e000496 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Harris, J., Atkinson, A., Mink, M. & Porcellato, L. Young people’s experiences and perceptions of YouTuber-produced health content: implications for health promotion. Health Educ. Behav. 48, 199–207 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolbrink, T. A., Kissoon, N., Mirza, N. & Burns, J. P. Building a global, online community of practice: the OPENPediatrics World Shared Practices Video Series. Acad. Med. 92, 676–679 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Woo, B. K. & Lu, H. T. Leveraging social media analytics for physicians. Acad. Med 98, 156–157 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Acquaviva, K. D. et al. Documenting social media engagement as scholarship: a new model for assessing academic accomplishment for the health professions. J. Med Internet Res. 22, e25070 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gasparyan, A. Y. et al. Researcher and author profiles: opportunities, advantages, and limitations. J. Korean Med Sci. 32, 1749–1756 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gifford, E. D. et al. Society for Vascular Surgery best practice recommendations for use of social media. J. Vasc. Surg. 74, 1783–1791.e1 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fargen, K. M. et al. Social media usage for neurointerventionalists: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee. J. Neurointerv Surg. 13, 674–678 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Husain, A. et al. Consensus guidelines for digital scholarship in academic promotion. West J. Emerg. Med. 21, 883–891 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bisset, C. N., McDermott, F. D. & Keller, D. S. The impact of a dedicated social media strategy on enhancing surgical education. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 408, 412 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Widmer, R. J. et al. Effect of promotion via social media on access of articles in an academic medical journal: a randomized controlled trial. Acad. Med. 94, 1546–1553 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Kikelomo Babata contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript, drafted the initial version, revised it critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for submission. Dr. Daniel O’Reilly contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript, drafted the initial version, revised it critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for submission. Dr. Damian Roland contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript, reviewed the original version, revised it critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kikelomo Babata.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babata, K., O’Reilly, D. & Roland, D. Transforming academic medicine through social media: why isn’t it working for me?. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04388-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04388-0

Search

Quick links