Table 2 Study quality assessment using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Source | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Rating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
i | ii | iii | iv | v | vi | vii | ||
Crawford 2011 [17] | * | * | ** | Poor | ||||
DeAntoni 1996 [18] | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | Good | |
Espaldon 2014 [19] | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | Good | |
Gray 2003 [29] | * | * | * | ** | * | * | Good | |
Gray 2005 [30] | * | * | * | ** | * | * | Good | |
Lacher 2006 [24] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | Good |
Lacher 2015 [21] | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | Good | |
Matti 2021 [28] | * | * | * | ** | * | Poor | ||
Rhodes 2012a [22] | * | * | ** | Poor | ||||
Rhodes 2012b [23] | * | * | ** | Poor | ||||
Saraiya 2005 [26] | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | Good | |
Sarma 2014 [27] | * | ** | * | ** | Poor | |||
Weinrich 1988 [25] | * | * | ** | * | Poor | |||