Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

PSMA-PET imaging in prostate cancer patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence: implications from an “EMBARK-Like” cohort

Abstract

The EMBARK trial demonstrated improved survival with enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR), although staged using conventional imaging. Given the higher sensitivity of PSMA-PET, many of these patients could harbor metastatic disease. We retrospectively analyzed 587 patients with first BCR after radical treatment who underwent PSMA-PET. Patients were stratified according to EMBARK criteria for high-risk BCR. 169 patients (29%) met EMBARK criteria. They more often showed PSMA-PET positivity for any localization (82% vs 39%; p < 0.001) and metastatic disease (46% vs 15%; p < 0.001). Median PSA was higher and PSA doubling-time (PSADT) shorter (2.23 vs 0.43 ng/mL; 4.3 vs 9 months). Most High-risk BCR patients have a positive PSMA-PET, and many of these harbor metastatic disease at molecular imaging. Given the survival benefit from intensified systemic treatment with ARPI in this cohort, how to best combine systemic therapy with PSMA-PET guided metastases-directed-treatments remains an important future area of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandel P, Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Preisser F, Tian Z, Tilki D, et al. Triplet or doublet therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shore ND, Luz MDA, De Giorgi U, Gleave M, Gotto GT, Pieczonka CM, et al. Improved survival with enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2025:NEJMoa2510310. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2510310.

  3. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;395:1208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchi L, Castellucci P, Farolfi A, Droghetti M, Artigas C, Leite J, et al. Multicenter external validation of a nomogram for predicting positive prostate-specific membrane antigen/positron emission tomography scan in patients with prostate cancer recurrence. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:41–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofman MS, Kasivisvanathan V, Link E, Buteau J, Roberts MJ, Francis RJ, et al. Baseline nodal status on 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer is prognostic for treatment failure: follow-up of the proPSMA Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024:S2588931124002517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.006.

  6. Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26:240–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holzgreve A, Armstrong WR, Clark KJ, Benz MR, Smith CP, Djaileb L, et al. PSMA-PET/CT findings in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer with no metastatic disease by conventional imaging. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8:e2452971. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsukawa A, Yanagisawa T, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Tsuboi I, Kardoust Parizi M, et al. Salvage therapies for biochemical recurrence after definitive local treatment: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025;28:610–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00890-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Falkenbach F, Lischewski F, Knipper S, Koehler D, Karakiewicz PI, Tian Z, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided surgery in an EMBARK-like cohort of patients with oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: delay in systemic treatment. Eur Urol Focus. 2025;11:515–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Achard V, Tombal B. High-risk biochemical recurrence of locally treated prostate cancer after EMBARK. An end to decades of conventional wisdom?. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27:665–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00767-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization—MD, LB, FC, RS SF, PC, AF. Data curation—MD, VP, FC, AF, MB, FL, ADiG, PC, CM, PS, CA, JL, PC, QA, SR, MC, GM, QFdeG, BG, RD, DS, TL, NF, BP, PA, MV, MF, MS, FL, BRS. Formal analysis – MD, LB. Investigation—MD, VP, FC, AF, MB, FL, ADiG, PC, CM, PS, CA, JL, PC, QA, SR, MC, GM, QFdeG, BG, RD, DS, TL, NF, BP, PA, MV, MF, MS, FL, BRS. Methodology—MD, LB, RS, FM, SF, MB, QAS, MQ, FdeGB. Project administration—MD, VP, FC, AF, MB, FL, ADiG, PC, CM, PS, CA, JL, PC, QA, SR, MC, GM, QFdeG, BG, RD, DS. TL. NF, BP, PA, MV, MF, MS, FL, BRS. Supervision—FC, AF, MB, FC, AF, MB, CA, FM, SF, RS, DD. Writing—original draft : MD, VP, LB. Writing—review & editing—MD, VP, LB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Droghetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Droghetti, M., Pirelli, V., Ceci, F. et al. PSMA-PET imaging in prostate cancer patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence: implications from an “EMBARK-Like” cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01096-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01096-6

Search

Quick links