Fig. 7 | Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Fig. 7

From: SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific TFH cells exhibit unique responses in infected and vaccinated individuals

Fig. 7

Spike-specific CXCR3+ TFH cells were more able than spike-specific CXCR3 TFH cells to support ASCs differentiation in vitro. a Diagram of TFH cells or non-TFH cells coculturing with autologous memory B cells. b Representative flow plots of spike-specific ASCs after coculturing TFH cells or non-TFH cells with autologous memory B cells from healthy controls, convalescents, and vaccinees in the presence of SEB (100 ng/mL) for 6 days. ce Comparison of total ASCs, spike-specific ASCs, and spike-specific IgG in the supernatant between TFH and non-TFH cells after coculture with autologous memory B cells from healthy controls (n = 6), convalescents (n = 5), and vaccinees (n = 9). f Comparison of the total ASCs, spike-specific ASCs, and spike-specific IgG from before (n = 7) and after (n = 7) the third booster dose. g Diagram of CXCR3+ TFH cells or CXCR3 TFH cells coculturing with autologous memory B cells. h Representative flow plots of spike-specific ASCs after coculturing of CXCR3+ or CXCR3 TFH cells with autologous memory B cells from healthy controls, convalescents, and vaccinees in the presence of SEB (100 ng/mL) for 6 days. ik Comparison of frequencies of total ASCs, spike-specific ASCs, and spike-specific IgG in the supernatant between CXCR3+ TFH cells and CXCR3 TFH cells after coculturing with autologous memory B cells from healthy controls (n = 8), convalescents (n = 9), and vaccinees (n = 7) in the presence of SEB (100 ng/mL) for 6 days. For (cf) and (ik), paired t test was used to analyze the differences between the two groups. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. P < 0.05 was considered to be a two-tailed significant difference; ns, not significant

Back to article page