Table 2 Content and results of the survey handed over to the participants of the focus group workshop at the 2018 American Spinal Injury Association meeting.
What is your position concerning the following statements: | Strongly agree (1) | Agree (2) | Neither agree nor disagree (3) | Disagree (4) | Strongly disagree (5) | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The proposed taxonomy for documentation of non-SCI conditions addresses a clinically relevant topic | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
The proposed non-SCI taxonomy is logical and sound | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
The proposed documentation scheme of non-SCI conditions is easy to understand | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
The proposed non-SCI taxonomy is important in clinical routine | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.9 |
The proposed non-SCI taxonomy is important for research | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.7 |
The proposed non-SCI taxonomy is easy to teach | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.3 |
I will use the proposed non-SCI taxonomy in my daily work | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.9 |
I think that others will use the proposed non-SCI taxonomy in their daily work | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2.0 |
