Table 2 Voiding methods and bladder medication in participants across time-interval subgroups.

From: Urodynamic evaluation of neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injury within 6 months post-injury: a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Variables

Complete

Value (p)

Incomplete

Value (p)

0–90

N (%)

90–135

N (%)

135–180

N (%)

0–90

N (%)

90–135

N (%)

135–180

N (%)

Voiding method

   

7.933b (0.380)

   

6.035b (0.631)

 Foley

6 (54.5)

13 (39.4)

3 (15.8)

10 (29.4)

11 (18.0)

4 (12.1)

 Suprapubic

0 (0.0)

1 (3.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.9)

1 (1.6)

0 (0.0)

 CIC

5 (45.5)

16 (48.5)

12 (63.2)

8 (23.5)

17 (27.9)

9 (27.3)

 Spontaneous voiding

0 (0.0)

2 (6.1)

2 (10.5)

14 (41.2)

30 (49.2)

20 (60.6)

 Combined methodsc

0 (0.0)

1 (3.0)

2 (10.5)

1 (2.9)

2 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

Bladder medication

   

1.487b (0.846)

   

7.649a (0.105)

 Not used

7 (63.6)

18 (54.5)

13 (68.4)

26 (76.5)

32 (52.5)

17 (51.5)

 1 used

2 (18.2)

10 (30.3)

4 (21.1)

7 (20.6)

17 (27.9)

10 (30.3)

 2 Used

2 (18.2)

5 (15.2)

2 (10.5)

1 (2.9)

12 (19.7)

6 (18.2)

  1. CIC clean intermittent catheterization.
  2. aPearson’s chi-squared test. bFisher’s exact test. Bold is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
  3. cSpontaneous or Crede voiding + intermittent catheterization.
Back to article page