Abstract
Study design
Cross-sectional survey.
Objectives
The objective of this study is to compare self-reported satisfaction with life, and self-reported health and well-being of people with NTSCD, to that of people with TSCI, and with Australian population.
Setting
Victoria, Australia.
Methods
Participants completed surveys by post or email. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used to assess self-reported satisfaction with life, and health and well-being. Descriptive statistics are reported including median and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to investigate differences between groups.
Results
There were 41 participants: NTSCD (n = 14) and TSCI (n = 27). There were no significant differences in the median scores on the SWLS for NTSCD and TSCI, but both groups scored lower than the Australian non-disabled sample mean. There were significant differences between NTSCD and TSCI for SF-36 domains physical functioning, role limitations physical and vitality (p < 0.05). Median scores for both groups in all eight domains were lower than the means of the comparative Australian sample, except for role limitations emotional.
Conclusions
There were more apparent difficulties for people with NTSCD in completing desired functional tasks than those with TSCI. Both groups had lower self-reported satisfaction with life, and lower reported health and well-being in comparison to samples of non-disabled Australians.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Guilcher SJT, Parsons D, Craven BC, Jaglal SB, Verrier M. Developing quality of care indicators for patients with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI): a feasibility study using administrative health data. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;38:765–76.
Lee B, Cripps R, Fitzharris M, Wing P. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:110–6.
New P, Simmonds F, Stevemuer T. A population-based study comparing traumatic spinal cord injury and non-traumatic spinal cord injury using a national rehabilitation database. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:397–403.
Noreau L, Noonan VK, Cobb J, Leblond J, Dumont FS. Spinal cord injury community survey: a national, comprehensive study to portray the lives of canadians with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20:249–64.
Krause JS, Reed KS. Barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury: underlying dimensions and their relationship to labor force participation. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:285–91.
Migliorini C, Tonge B, Taleporos G. Spinal cord injury and mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008;42:309–14.
Guilcher SJT, Craven BC, Lemieux-Charles LC, Casciaro T, McColl MA, Jaglal SB. Secondary health conditions and spinal cord injury: an uphill battle in the journey of care. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:894–906.
Post M, Noreau L. Quality of life after spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:139–46.
Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Craven BC, Campbell KA, Boschen KA, McGillivray CF. Predicting life satisfaction after spinal cord injury in a Canadian sample. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:380–5.
McKinley W, Steel RT, Gardi RK, Tewksbury MK. Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:693–9.
New PW. Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:250–61.
New PW. Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39:665–70.
Barclay L, Lentin P, McDonald R, Bourke-Taylor H. Understanding the factors that influence the social and community participation as perceived by people with non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80:577–86.
New PW, Eriks-Hoogland I, Scivoletto G, Reeves RK, Townson A, Marshall R, et al. Important clinical rehabilitation principles unique to people with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23:299–312.
Migliorini C, New PW, Tonge B. Quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:365–70.
Cummins RA. Comprehensive quality of life scale—adult (COMQoL-A5), 5 ed. Melbourne: Deakin University; 1997.
Deiner E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Personal Assess. 1985;49:71–75.
Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903–12.
López-Ortega M, Torres-Castro S, Rosas-Carrasco O. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:170.
Post MW, van Leeuwen CM, van Koppenhagen CF, de Groot S. Validity of the life satisfaction questions, the life satisfaction questionnaire, and the satisfaction with life scale in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1832–7.
Pavot W, Diener E. The satisfaction with life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. J Posit Psychol. 2008;3:137–52.
Palmar B, Donaldson C, Stough C. Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personal Individ Diffs. 2002;33:1091–1100.
McCallum J. The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measure. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:160–6.
Butterworth P, Crosier T. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:44.
Ware JE, Sherbourne KD. The MOS 36-item short-from survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.
Ware JE, Kosinski MA, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2005.
Dal Grande E, Taylor A. Quality of Life in South Australia as measured by the SF36. Department of Human Services. Population Research and Outcomes Studies Unit. South Australia: Population Research and Outcomes Studies Unit; 2004. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242165557_Quality_of_life_in_South_Australia_as_measured_by_the_SF36_Population_Norms_for_2002_Trends_from_1994_to_2002_and_Impact_of_Chronic_Diseases_and_Health_Risk_Factors_on_Quality_of_Life. Accessed 23 May 2019.
Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:382–9.
McKinley W, Steel RT, Hardman JT. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:619–23.
New P, Rawicki B, Bailey MJ. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: demographic characteristics and complications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:996–1001.
New PW. Non-traumatic spinal cord injury: what is the ideal setting for rehabilitation? Aust Health Rev. 2006;30:353–61.
A.I.H.W: Canberra, Australia. Spinal cord injury, Australia 2012–13, Injury Research and Statistics Series Number 99; 2014
Department of Social Services. Why is aged care changing? https://www.dss.gov.au/ageing-and-aged-care-aged-care-reform/why-is-aged-care-changing. Accessed Sept 2018.
Van Leeuwen CC, Post M, Westers P, van der Woude L, de Groot S. Relationships between activities, participation, personal factors, mental health, and life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:82–89.
Lee BB, Simpson JM, King MT, Haran MJ, Marial O. The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:50–55.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank AQA SPIRE and the Spinal Network for promoting our research in their newsletters.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barclay, L., New, P.W., Morgan, P.E. et al. Satisfaction with life, health and well-being: comparison between non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, traumatic spinal cord injury and Australian norms. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 5, 50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0193-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0193-9
This article is cited by
-
The interrelationship between pain, life satisfaction and mental health in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury, in the context of a developing country
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2024)
-
Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 3. Drivers of quality of life in people with spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2023)
