Abstract
Microbial cooperation drives ecological and epidemiological processes and is affected by the ecology and demography of populations. Population density influences the selection for cooperation, with spatial structure and the type of social dilemma, namely public-goods production or self-restraint, shaping the outcome. While existing theories predict that in spatially structured environments increasing population density can select either for or against cooperation, experimental studies with both public-goods production and self-restraint systems have only ever shown that increasing population density favours cheats. We suggest that the disparity between theory and empirical studies results from experimental procedures not capturing environmental conditions predicted by existing theories to influence the outcome. Our study resolves this issue and provides the first experimental evidence that high population density can favour cooperation in spatially structured environments for both self-restraint and public-goods production systems. Moreover, using a multi-trait mathematical model supported by laboratory experiments we extend this result to systems where the self-restraint and public-goods social dilemmas interact. We thus provide a systematic understanding of how the strength of interaction between the two social dilemmas and the degree of spatial structure within an environment affect selection for cooperation. These findings help to close the current gap between theory and experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Crespi BJ. The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16:178–83.
Kaiser C, Franklin O, Richter A, Dieckmann U. Social dynamics within decomposer communities lead to nitrogen retention and organic matter build-up in soils. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8960.
Lee HH, Molla MN, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Bacterial charity work leads to population-wide resistance. Nature. 2010;467:82–85.
Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A. Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature. 2004;430:1024–7.
Lindsay RJ, Kershaw MJ, Pawlowska BJ, Talbot NJ, Gudelj I. Harbouring public good mutants within a pathogen population can increase both fitness and virulence. Elife. 2016; 5: e18678.
Crespi B, Foster K, Ubeda F. First principles of Hamiltonian medicine. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369:20130366.
Datta MS, Korolev KS, Cvijovic I, Dudley C, Gore J. Range expansion promotes cooperation in an experimental microbial metapopulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:7354–9.
Dobay A, Bagheri HC, Messina A, Kümmerli R, Rankin DJ. Interaction effects of cell diffusion, cell density and public goods properties on the evolution of cooperation in digital microbes. J Evol Biol. 2014;27:1869–77.
Greig D, Travisano M. The Prisoner’s Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes. Proc Biol Sci. 2004;271:S25–26.
MacLean RC, Gudelj I. Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast. Nature. 2006;441:498–501.
Ross-Gillespie A, Gardner A, Buckling A, West SA, Griffin AS. Density dependence and cooperation: theory and a test with bacteria. Evolution. 2009;63:2315–25.
Chen A, Sanchez A, Dai L, Gore J. Dynamics of a producer-freeloader ecosystem on the brink of collapse. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3713.
West SA, Diggle SP, Buckling A, Gardner A, Griffin AS. The social lives of microbes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;38:53–77.
Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science. 2001;292:504.
Lion S. Evolution of reproductive effort in viscous populations: the importance of population dynamics. J Evol Biol. 2010;23:866–74.
Lion S, Gandon S. Habitat saturation and the spatial evolutionary ecology of altruism. J Evol Biol. 2009;22:1487–502.
Kümmerli R, Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A, Harrison F. Viscous medium promotes cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276:3531–8.
Celiker H, Gore J. Competition between species can stabilize public-goods cooperation within a species. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:621.
Gore J, Youk H, van Oudenaarden A. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature. 2009;459:253–6.
Harrison F, Buckling A. Siderophore production and biofilm formation as linked social traits. ISME J. 2009;3:632–4.
MacLean RC, Fuentes-Hernandez A, Greig D, Hurst LD, Gudelj I. A mixture of “cheats” and “co-operators” can enable maximal group benefit. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8: e1000486.
Brown SP, Taylor PD. Joint evolution of multiple social traits: a kin selection analysis. Proc R Soc B. 2009;277;1680:415-422.
Ross-Gillespie A, Dumas Z, Kümmerli R. Evolutionary dynamics of interlinked public goods traits: an experimental study of siderophore production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Evol Biol. 2015;28:29–39.
Schweizer M, Dickinson JR. The Metabolism and Molecular Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. CRC Press; 2004.
Talbot NJ. Living the sweet life: how does a plant pathogenic fungus acquire sugar from plants? PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000308.
Otterstedt K, Larsson C, Bill RM, Ståhlberg A, Boles E, Hohmann S, et al. Switching the mode of metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:532–7.
Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:468–77.
Weusthuis RA, Pronk JT, van den Broek PJ, van Dijken JP. Chemostat cultivation as a tool for studies on sugar transport in yeasts. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:616–30.
Koschwanez JH, Foster KR, Murray AW. Sucrose utilization in budding yeast as a model for the origin of undifferentiated multicellularity. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001122.
Dai L, Vorselen D, Korolev KS, Gore J. Generic indicators for loss of resilience before a tipping point leading to population collapse. Science. 2012;336:1175–7.
Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am Nat. 1991;138:1315–41.
Wieczorke R, Krampe S, Weierstall T, Freidel K, Hollenberg CP, Boles E. Concurrent knock-out of at least 20 transporter genes is required to block uptake of hexoses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1999;464:123–8.
Sanchez A, Gore J. Feedback between population and evolutionary dynamics determines the fate of social microbial populations. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001547.
Boots M, Mealor M. Local interactions select for lower pathogen infectivity. Science. 2007;315:1284–6.
Dai L, Korolev KS, Gore J. Slower recovery in space before collapse of connected populations. Nature. 2013;496:355–8.
Le Gac M, Doebeli M. Environmental viscosity does not affect the evolution of cooperation during experimental evolution of colicigenic bacteria. Evolution. 2010;64:522–33.
van Gestel J, Weissing FJ, Kuipers OP, Kovács AT. Density of founder cells affects spatial pattern formation and cooperation in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. ISME J. 2014;8:2069–79.
Rainey PB, Travisano M. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature. 1998;394:69–72.
Nadell CD, Foster KR, Xavier JB. Emergence of spatial structure in cell groups and the evolution of cooperation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000716.
Boddy L. Interspecific combative interactions between wood-decaying basidiomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;31:185–94.
Ettema CH, Wardle DA. Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:177–83.
Greig D, Leu JY. Natural history of budding yeast. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R886–90.
Excoffier L, Ray N. Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:347–51.
Travis JM, Münkemüller T, Burton OJ, Best A, Dytham C, Johst K. Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:2334–43.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Robert Beardmore for comments and helpful discussions.
Funding
RJL and IG: European Research Council No. 647292 MathModExp. BJP: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Doctoral training grant studentship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindsay, R.J., Pawlowska, B.J. & Gudelj, I. When increasing population density can promote the evolution of metabolic cooperation. ISME J 12, 849–859 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0016-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0016-6
This article is cited by
-
Experimental evolution of yeast shows that public-goods upregulation can evolve despite challenges from exploitative non-producers
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Short-range interactions govern the dynamics and functions of microbial communities
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2020)
-
Selfish, sharing and scavenging bacteria in the Atlantic Ocean: a biogeographical study of bacterial substrate utilisation
The ISME Journal (2019)
-
Privatization of public goods can cause population decline
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2019)
