Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cost analysis of CYP2C19 genetic testing in percutaneous coronary intervention patients

Abstract

CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) carriers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of ischemic events when treated with clopidogrel. PCI patients in TAILOR-PCI were randomized to clopidogrel or genotype-guided (GG) therapy in which LOF carriers received ticagrelor and non-carriers clopidogrel. Direct medical costs associated with a GG approach have not been described before. TAILOR-PCI participants for whom direct medical costs were available for the duration from the date of PCI to one-year post PCI were included. Primary cost estimates were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Cost Data Warehouse. There were no differences in direct medical costs between the GG and clopidogrel groups (mean $20,682 versus $19,747, p = 0.11) however total costs were greater in the GG group (mean $21,245 versus $19,891, p = 0.02) which was primarily driven by ticagrelor costs. In conclusion the increased expense of a GG strategy post PCI as compared to clopidogrel for all is primarily driven by the cost of ticagrelor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Optimal DAPT analysis.
Fig. 2: Consort diagram.
Fig. 3: Ischemic outcomes based on DAPT strategy.
Fig. 4: Ischemic outcomes based on CYP2C19 genotype.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Aggregate deidentified data could be made available based on participant consent to allow sharing of data from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet J, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Bliden K, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;304:1821–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Castrichini M, Luzum JA, Pereira N. Pharmacogenetics of antiplatelet therapy. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023;63:211–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown SA, Pereira N. Pharmacogenomic impact of CYP2C19 variation on clopidogrel therapy in precision cardiovascular medicine. J Pers Med. 2018;8:8.

  4. Pereira NL, Farkouh ME, So D, Lennon R, Geller N, Mathew V, et al. Effect of genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor selection vs conventional clopidogrel therapy on ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324:761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingraham BS, Farkouh ME, Lennon RJ, So D, Goodman SG, Geller N, et al. Genetic-guided oral P2Y(12) inhibitor selection and cumulative ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:816–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Claassens DMF, Vos GJA, Bergmeijer TO, Hermanides RS, van ‘t Hof AWJ, van der Harst P, et al. A genotype-guided strategy for oral P2Y(12) inhibitors in primary PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1621–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parcha V, Heindl BF, Li P, Kalra R, Limdi NA, Pereira NL, et al. Genotype-guided P2Y(12) inhibitor therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: A Bayesian analysis. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021;14:e003353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Visscher SL, Naessens JM, Yawn BP, Reinalda MS, Anderson SS, Borah BJ. Developing a standardized healthcare cost data warehouse. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:1074–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavallari LH, Lee CR, Beitelshees AL, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Duarte JD, Voora D, et al. Multisite investigation of outcomes with implementation of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:181–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CR, Sriramoju VB, Cervantes A, Howell LA, Varunok N, Madan S, et al. Clinical outcomes and sustainability of using CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11:e002069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira NL, Rihal C, Lennon R, Marcus G, Shrivastava S, Bell MR, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 genotype on ischemic outcomes during oral P2Y(12) inhibitor therapy. a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:739–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galli M, Benenati S, Capodanno D, Franchi F, Rollini F, D’Amario D, et al. Guided versus standard antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;397:1470–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borah BJ, Pereira N, Farkouh ME. Personalizing antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Are they cost-effective? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017;31:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lala A, Berger JS, Sharma G, Hochman JS, Scott Braithwaite R, Ladapo JA. Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:81–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim K, Touchette DR, Cavallari LH, Ardati AK, DiDomenico RJ. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to personalize the selection of P2Y(12) inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019;33:533–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Galli M, Benenati S, Franchi F, Rollini F, Capodanno D, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Comparative effects of guided vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of 61 898 patients from 15 randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:959–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. AlMukdad S, Elewa H, Al-Badriyeh D. Economic evaluations of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy compared to the universal use of antiplatelets in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25:201–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Claassens DMF, van Dorst PWM, Vos GJA, Bergmeijer TO, Hermanides RS, van ‘t Hof AWJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the POPular Genetics Trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022;22:195–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong OM, Friede KA, Chanfreau-Coffinier C, Voora D. Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitors in Veterans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023;9:249–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH (grants U01HL128606 and U01HL128626).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BB, NLP designed the study. SH, RL collected the data. AH, JM, RL, BB, NLP analyzed the data. AH, JM, MAH, RL, KB, BB, NLP interpreted the data. SH, JM, MAH, RL, KB, MB, NG, AL, VM, YR, MF, CR, BB, NLP prepared, reviewed, revised and provided final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bijan Borah or Naveen L. Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

BB is a consultant for Exact Sciences and Boehringer Ingelheim on projects unrelated to this project.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huxley, S., Moriarty, J., Hlatky, M.A. et al. Cost analysis of CYP2C19 genetic testing in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Pharmacogenomics J 24, 32 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-024-00353-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-024-00353-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links