Table 3 Assessment of methodological quality of the meta-analyses regarding non-critical domains of the AMSTAR-2 checklist.
From: Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): a systematic meta-review of its effectiveness
Meta-Analysis ID | PICO | Design | Screening | Extraction | Inclusion | Funding | Impact of RoB | Heterogeneity | Publication bias | Conflict of interest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiang [30] | yes | no | yes | yes | partial yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
vanOosterhout [28] | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
EichnerBerna [22] | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Liu [23] | yes | no | yes | yes | partial yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
Philipp [24] | yes | no | yes | yes | partial yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Sauvé [25] | yes | no | yes | yes | partial yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Penney [26] | yes | yes | yes | yes | partial yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |