Table 2 Risk of incident cognitive impairment according to the changing trend of RLLCa.

From: Effects of self-managed lifestyle behavioral changes on cognitive impairment control in Chinese older adults: a population-based prospective study

 

Changing trend of RLLC

Stable healthyd

Positively adjustede

Negatively adjustedf

Stable unhealthyg

Incident cognitive impairment

 No. of cases

103

6

282

156

 Person-years

1189

191

783

654

 Cases per 1000 person-years

86.63

31.41

360.15

238.53

Minimally adjusted modelb

 HR (95% CI)

0.45 (0.34, 0.61)

0.16 (0.07, 0.35)

1.55 (1.27, 1.89)

1 [Reference]

 P value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

 

Fully adjusted modelc

 HR (95% CI)

0.46 (0.34, 0.62)

0.16 (0.07, 0.35)

1.55 (1.27, 1.90)

1 [Reference]

 P value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

 
  1. RLLC risk level of lifestyle behaviors for cognition, HR hazard ratio.
  2. aThe sample size for this analysis is 1391.
  3. bAdjusted for age, sex, education level and residence location.
  4. cAdjusted for age, sex, education level, residence location and chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipemia, coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease).
  5. dBoth baseline RLLC and follow-up RLLC are low.
  6. eIntermediate (baseline) to low (follow-up); high (baseline) to low (follow-up); high (baseline) to intermediate (follow-up).
  7. fLow (baseline) to intermediate (follow-up); low (baseline) to high (follow-up); intermediate (baseline) to high (follow-up).
  8. gIntermediate (baseline) to intermediate (follow-up); high (baseline) to high (follow-up).