Abstract
Chromosome instability (CIN) and subsequent aneuploidy are prevalent in various human malignancies, influencing tumor progression such as metastases and relapses. Extensive studies demonstrate the development of chemoresistance in high-CIN tumors, which poses significant therapeutic challenges. Given the association of CIN with poorer prognosis and suppressed immune microenvironment observed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), here we aimed to discover chemotherapeutic drugs exhibiting increased inhibition against high-CIN CRC cells. By using machine learning methods, we screened out two BCL-XL inhibitors Navitoclax and WEHI-539 as CIN-sensitive reagents in CRC. Subsequent analyses using a CIN-aneuploidy cell model confirmed the vulnerability of high-CIN CRC cells to these drugs. We further revealed the critical role of BCL-XL in the viability of high-CIN CRC cells. In addition, to ease the evaluation of CIN levels in clinic, we developed a three-gene signature as a CIN surrogate to predict prognosis, chemotherapeutic and immune responses in CRC samples. Our results demonstrate the potential value of CIN as a therapeutic target in CRC treatment and the importance of BCL-XL in regulating survival of high-CIN CRC cells, therefore representing a valuable attempt to translate a common trait of heterogeneous tumor cells into an effective therapeutic target.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li M, Zhang P. Spindle assembly checkpoint, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3440.
Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:478–87.
Sotillo R, Schvartzman JM, Socci ND, Benezra R. Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature. 2010;464:436–40.
Jamal-Hanjani M, Wilson GA, McGranahan N, Birkbak NJ, Watkins TBK, Veeriah S, et al. Tracking the evolution of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2109–21.
Bakhoum SF, Ngo B, Laughney AM, Cavallo JA, Murphy CJ, Ly P, et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature. 2018;553:467–72.
Davoli T, Uno H, Wooten EC, Elledge SJ. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science 2017;355:eaaf8399.
Bakhoum SF, Cantley LC. The multifaceted role of chromosomal instability in cancer and its microenvironment. Cell. 2018;174:1347–60.
Lee AJ, Endesfelder D, Rowan AJ, Walther A, Birkbak NJ, Futreal PA, et al. Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1858–70.
Ippolito MR, Martis V, Martin S, Tijhuis AE, Hong C, Wardenaar R, et al. Gene copy-number changes and chromosomal instability induced by aneuploidy confer resistance to chemotherapy. Dev Cell. 2021;56:2440–54.e6.
Lukow DA, Sausville EL, Suri P, Chunduri NK, Wieland A, Leu J, et al. Chromosomal instability accelerates the evolution of resistance to anti-cancer therapies. Dev Cell. 2021;56:2427–39.e4.
Fang X, Yin H, Zhang H, Wu F, Liu Y, Fu Y, et al. p53 mediates hydroxyurea resistance in aneuploid cells of colon cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2019;376:39–48.
Replogle JM, Zhou W, Amaro AE, McFarland JM, Villalobos-Ortiz M, Ryan J, et al. Aneuploidy increases resistance to chemotherapeutics by antagonizing cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:30566–76.
Crowley EA, Hermance NM, Herlihy CP, Manning AL. Suppression of chromosome instability limits acquired drug resistance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2022;21:1583–93.
Goldman MJ, Craft B, Hastie M, Repecka K, McDade F, Kamath A, et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:675–8.
Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1.
Therneau TM. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.2-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival 2020.
Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P. Survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer 2020.
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–7.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.
Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–25.
Hanzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinforma. 2013;14:7.
Charoentong P, Finotello F, Angelova M, Mayer C, Efremova M, Rieder D, et al. Pan-cancer immunogenomic analyses reveal genotype-immunophenotype relationships and predictors of response to checkpoint blockade. Cell Rep. 2017;18:248–62.
Yang W, Soares J, Greninger P, Edelman EJ, Lightfoot H, Forbes S, et al. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D955–61.
Maeser D, Gruener RF, Huang RS. oncoPredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data. Brief Bioinform 2021;22:bbab260.
Chen H, Boutros PC. VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinforma. 2011;12:35.
Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap 2019.
Hadley W. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (Springer-Verlag New York, New York, NY, 2016).
McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4288–97.
Kuhn M. Caret: classification and regression training. R package version 6.0-86. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret 2020.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33:1–22.
Simon N, Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for Cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2011;39:1–13.
Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32:5381–97.
Kassambara A ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr 2020.
Zhao Y, Lin J, Xu B, Hu S, Zhang X, Wu L. MicroRNA-mediated repression of nonsense mRNAs. Elife. 2014;3:e03032.
Fang X, Liu Y, Xiao W, Zhao N, Zhu C, Yu D, et al. Prognostic SLC family genes promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2021;53:1065–75.
Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP. Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;24:148–54.
Redman-Rivera LN, Shaver TM, Jin H, Marshall CB, Schafer JM, Sheng Q, et al. Acquisition of aneuploidy drives mutant p53-associated gain-of-function phenotypes. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5184.
Walther A, Houlston R, Tomlinson I. Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2008;57:941–50.
Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K, et al. Chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotype, CIN high or CIN low, predicts survival for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2256–64.
Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. 2018;24:541–50.
Karpel-Massler G, Ishida CT, Bianchetti E, Shu C, Perez-Lorenzo R, Horst B, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial matrix chaperones and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins empower antitumor therapeutic responses. Cancer Res. 2017;77:3513–26.
Cory S, Adams JM. The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:647–56.
Scherr AL, Gdynia G, Salou M, Radhakrishnan P, Duglova K, Heller A, et al. Bcl-xL is an oncogenic driver in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2342.
Minn AJ, Boise LH, Thompson CB. Expression of Bcl-xL and loss of p53 can cooperate to overcome a cell cycle checkpoint induced by mitotic spindle damage. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2621–31.
Vasudevan A, Baruah PS, Smith JC, Wang Z, Sayles NM, Andrews P, et al. Single-chromosomal gains can function as metastasis suppressors and promoters in colon cancer. Dev Cell. 2020;52:413–28.e6.
Vogler M, Hamali HA, Sun XM, Bampton ET, Dinsdale D, Snowden RT, et al. BCL2/BCL-X(L) inhibition induces apoptosis, disrupts cellular calcium homeostasis, and prevents platelet activation. Blood. 2011;117:7145–54.
Schoenwaelder SM, Jarman KE, Gardiner EE, Hua M, Qiao J, White MJ, et al. Bcl-xL-inhibitory BH3 mimetics can induce a transient thrombocytopathy that undermines the hemostatic function of platelets. Blood. 2011;118:1663–74.
Li M, Fang X, Baker DJ, Guo L, Gao X, Wei Z, et al. The ATM-p53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14188–93.
Sotillo R, Hernando E, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Teruya-Feldstein J, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW, et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:9–23.
Delbridge AR, Grabow S, Strasser A, Vaux DL. Thirty years of BCL-2: translating cell death discoveries into novel cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:99–109.
Weaver BA, Silk AD, Montagna C, Verdier-Pinard P, Cleveland DW. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:25–36.
Thompson SL, Compton DA. Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2010;188:369–81.
Zhang J, Hirst AJ, Duan F, Qiu H, Huang R, Ji Y, et al. Anti-apoptotic mutations desensitize human pluripotent stem cells to mitotic stress and enable aneuploid cell survival. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12:557–71.
Schukken KM, Sheltzer JM. Extensive protein dosage compensation in aneuploid human cancers. Genome Res. 2022;32:1254–70.
Fujiwara N, Nakagawa H, Enooku K, Kudo Y, Hayata Y, Nakatsuka T, et al. CPT2 downregulation adapts HCC to lipid-rich environment and promotes carcinogenesis via acylcarnitine accumulation in obesity. Gut. 2018;67:1493–504.
Gonzalez-Romero F, Mestre D, Aurrekoetxea I, O’Rourke CJ, Andersen JB, Woodhoo A, et al. E2F1 and E2F2-mediated repression of CPT2 establishes a lipid-rich tumor-promoting environment. Cancer Res. 2021;81:2874–87.
Dobson CM, Wai T, Leclerc D, Wilson A, Wu X, Dore C, et al. Identification of the gene responsible for the cblA complementation group of vitamin B12-responsive methylmalonic acidemia based on analysis of prokaryotic gene arrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15554–9.
Jia Q, Wu W, Wang Y, Alexander PB, Sun C, Gong Z, et al. Local mutational diversity drives intratumoral immune heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5361.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support of the “Youth Talent Support Program” from Yangzhou University. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972251 to XF and 32170552 to YZ), Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (23KJA310012 to XF and 21KJA180001 to YZ), and the Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline Cultivation Unit (JSDW202251).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XF and YZ designed the study. XF performed the bioinformatic analyses. WYY and YZ established the cell lines, performed cell viability, real-time PCR and flow cytometry analyses. WYY, TTX, and YZ performed the animal experiments. CMZ performed the chromosome spread assays with input of XRS and JX. NZ performed the caspase 3 activity assays. WZ and LJW constructed the plasmids and performed the Western blot analyses. XF, WYY, and YZ interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, X., Yu, Wy., Zhu, Cm. et al. Chromosome instability functions as a potential therapeutic reference by enhancing chemosensitivity to BCL-XL inhibitors in colorectal carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol Sin 45, 2420–2431 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-024-01372-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-024-01372-y
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Emerging artificial intelligence-driven precision therapies in tumor drug resistance: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges
Molecular Cancer (2025)
-
BCL-xL dependency in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
Cancer Gene Therapy (2025)