Table 2 Risk of bias analysis performed by ROBDemat.
Author | Year | Domain 1: Bias in planning and allocation | Domain 2: Bias in sample/specimen preparation | Domain 3: Bias in outcome assessment | Domain 4: Bias in data treatment and outcome reporting | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1: Control group | 1.2: Randomization of samples | 1.3: Sample size rationale and reporting | 2.1: Standardization of samples and materials | 2.2: Identical experimental conditions across groups | 3.1: Adequate and standardized testing procedures and outcomes | 3.2: Blinding of the test operator | 4.1: Statistical analysis | 4.2: Reporting study outcomes | ||
Ming et al. | 2023 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Pinto et al. | 2023 | SR | IR | SR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Saisho et al. | 2023 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Taques et al. | 2023 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Abdelkader et al. | 2022 | SR | NR | NR | IR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Ghanem et al. | 2022 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Nodehi et al. | 2022 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Gama et al. | 2021 | SR | NR | NR | IR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Seckler et al. | 2020 | SR | SR | SR | IR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Eid et al. | 2019 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Eid et al. | 2019 | SR | NR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Eid et al. | 2019 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Pang et al. | 2019 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
da Costa et al. | 2017 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Passos et al. | 2017 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |
Tsintsadze et al. | 2017 | SR | IR | NR | SR | SR | SR | NR | SR | SR |