Table 3 Statistical analysis for comparison of gender with age, occupation and aesthetic preference.

From: Comparative analysis of facial aesthetics in AI generated versus conventionally crafted digital smile designs—a cross-sectional study

 

Categories

N

Sex:

Chi square

P value

Female (N (%))

Male (N (%))

Age:

18–25

161

100 (52.1)

61 (47.7)

3.996

0.407

26–35

91

49 (25.5)

42 (32.8)

  

36–45

25

17 (8.9)

8 (6.2)

  

46–55

30

20 (10.4)

10 (7.8)

  

Above 55

13

6 (3.1)

7 (5.5)

  

Occupation

Dental Student

98

55 (28.6)

43 (33.6)

4.442

0.109

Dentist

112

76 (39.6)

36 (28.1)

  

Others

110

61 (31.8)

49 (38.3)

  

Select the smile design you find more aesthetically pleasing in CASE:1

AI preferred

100

58 (30.2)

42 (32.8)

0.242

0.622

Manual Preferred

220

134 (69.8)

86 (67.2)

  

Select the smile design you find more aesthetically pleasing in CASE:2

AI preferred

98

51 (26.6)

47 (36.7)

3.729

0.053

Manual Preferred

222

141 (73.4)

81 (63.3)

  

Select the smile design you find more aesthetically pleasing in CASE:3

AI preferred

126

73 (38)

53 (41.4)

0.369

0.544

Manual Preferred

194

119 (62)

75 (58.6)

  

Select the smile design you find more aesthetically pleasing in CASE:4

AI preferred

127

74 (38.5)

53 (41.4)

0.263

0.608

Manual Preferred

193

118 (61.5)

75 (58.6)

  

% preference to AI

0

80

53 (27.6)

27 (21.1)

5.657

0.226

25

89

52 (27.1)

37 (28.9)

  

50

111

65 (33.9)

46 (35.9)

  

75

20

14 (7.3)

6 (4.7)

  

100

20

8 (4.2)

12 (9.4)