Fig. 3: Correlation between the percentages of cMo supplied by five centers (A–E) and those determined by the centralized analysis for 329 flow cytometry raw data files. | Blood Cancer Journal

Fig. 3: Correlation between the percentages of cMo supplied by five centers (A–E) and those determined by the centralized analysis for 329 flow cytometry raw data files.

From: Multicenter validation of the flow measurement of classical monocyte fraction for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis

Fig. 3

a, c, e, g, i, k Correlation between the percentages of cMo supplied by the five centers (A–E) and those determined by the centralized analysis. All percentages (%) were compared using a Pearson correlation test (correlation factor r is shown). b, d, f, h, j, l Bland–Altman plots showing putative bias between cMo percentages supplied by the five centers (A –E) and those determined by the centralized analysis

Back to article page