Table 1 Baseline Demographics.

From: Efficacy and safety of enasidenib and azacitidine combination in patients with IDH2 mutated acute myeloid leukemia and not eligible for intensive chemotherapy

Baseline Characteristics

Total (n = 26)

Newly diagnosed n = 7

Relapsed/refractory n = 19

Age (years)

68 (24–88)

77 (66–81)

64 (24–88)

Sex (male)

20 (84)

6 (86)

14 (82)

Performance status

ECOG 0

1 (4)

1 (14)

0

ECOG 1

18 (69)

4 (57)

14 (74)

ECOG ≥ 2

7 (28)

2 (29)

5 (26)

Hematological parameters

Hemoglobin (mg/dL)

8.6 (6.2–13.7)

8.4 (6.2–10.6)

8.8 (7.1–13.7)

White Blood Count, x109/L

3.8 (0.4–270)

6 (2–270)

1.5 (0.4–36)

Platelet, x109/L

52 (12–1145)

74 (30–1145)

30 (12–223)

Circulating blasts (%)

20 (0–95)

34 (10–95)

5 (0–66)

Bone marrow blasts (%),

39 [4–87]

57 [20–86]

20 [4–87]

ELN 2017 risk group

Intermediate

14 (59)

5 (71)

9 (47)

Adverse

12 (41)

2 (29)

10 (53)

Diagnosis

In first relapse

 

0

8(42)

In second or later relapse

 

0

11 (58)

Prior AML therapies

HMA

9 (28)

1 (14)

9 (42)

ENA

3 (12)

 

3 (16)

HSCT

5 (19)

 

5 (26)

Co-occurring mutations

ASXL1

5 (19)

2 (29)

3 (16)

DNMT3A

8 (31)

2 (29)

6 (31)

FLT3

3 (12)

2 (29)

1 (5)

NPM1

5 (19)

1 (14)

4 (21)

(K/N) RAS

3 (12)

0

3 (16)

RUNX1

6 (23)

2 (29)

4 (21)

SRSF2

10 (38)

5 (71)

5 (26)

TET2

5 (19)

1 (14)

4 (21)

TP53

2 (8)

0

2 (11)

  1. ECOG- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ELN- European Leukemia Net, HMA- Hypomethylating agent, ENA- Enasidenib, HSCT- Hematopoietic cell transplantation.
  2. All results expressed as No. (%) or median [Minimum–maximum], unless specified.