Table 2 Comparison of gene mutations between AML patients with and without MDS-R mutations.

From: Poor prognostic implications of myelodysplasia-related mutations in both older and younger patients with de novo AML

Categories

Variables

Total cohort (N = 1213)

Younger population

Older population

Without MDS-R mutations (n = 525, 76.6%)

With MDS-R mutations (n = 160, 23.4%)

P value

Without MDS-R mutations (n = 291, 55.1%)

With MDS-R mutations (n = 237, 44.9%)

P value

Activated signaling

FLT3-ITDHigh a,b

152 (12.5%)

76 (14.6%)

16 (10.0%)

0.146

35 (12.0%)

25 (10.5%)

0.594

FLT3-ITDLow a,b

93 (7.7%)

48 (9.2%)

8 (5.0%)

0.094

25 (8.6%)

12 (5.1%)

0.114

FLT3-TKD

91 (7.5%)

37 (7.0%)

14 (8.8%)

0.492

22 (7.6%)

18 (7.6%)

>0.999

KIT

57 (4.7%)

34 (6.5%)

8 (5.0%)

0.576

14 (4.8%)

1 (0.4%)

0.002

NRAS

169 (13.9%)

76 (14.5%)

22 (13.8%)

0.898

39 (13.4%)

32 (13.5%)

>0.999

KRAS

51 (4.2%)

28 (5.3%)

7 (4.4%)

0.837

8 (2.7%)

8 (3.4%)

0.800

PTPN11

69 (5.7%)

30 (5.7%)

8 (5.0%)

0.845

17 (5.8%)

14 (5.9%)

>0.999

Tumor suppressor

TP53

111 (9.2%)

25 (4.8%)

10 (6.3%)

0.420

60 (20.6%)

16 (6.8%)

<0.001

WTI

79 (6.5%)

50 (9.5%)

10 (6.3%)

0.263

14 (4.8%)

5 (2.1%)

0.106

PHF6

34 (2.8%)

8 (1.5%)

10 (6.3%)

0.003

4 (1.4%)

12 (5.1%)

0.020

NPM1

257 (21.2%)

116 (22.1%)

5 (3.1%)

<0.001

103 (35.4%)

33 (13.9%)

<0.001

DNA methylation

IDH1

77 (6.3%)

31 (5.9%)

6 (3.8%)

0.423

22 (7.6%)

18 (7.6%)

>0.999

IDH2

148 (12.2%)

38 (7.2%)

25 (15.6%)

0.003

42 (14.4%)

43 (18.1%)

0.284

DNMT3A

216 (17.8%)

83 (15.8%)

23 (14.4%)

0.709

73 (25.2%)

37 (15.6%)

0.007

TET2

162 (13.4%)

40 (7.6%)

7 (4.4%)

0.210

51 (17.5%)

64 (27.0%)

0.011

Cohesin complex genes

STAG2

57 (4.7%)

0 (0%)

16 (10.0%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

41 (17.3%)

<0.001

RAD21

25 (2.1%)

17 (3.2%)

3 (1.9%)

0.591

2 (0.7%)

3 (1.3%)

0.661

SMC1A

18 (1.5%)

11 (2.1%)

2 (1.3%)

0.743

4 (1.4%)

1 (0.4%)

0.257

SMC3

9 (0.7%)

3 (0.6%)

2 (1.3%)

0.332

3 (1.0%)

1 (0.4%)

0.631

Transcription factor

CEBPAdouble mutations

103 (8.5%)

73 (13.9%)

12 (7.5%)

0.039

10 (3.4%)

8 (3.4%)

>0.999

CEBPA bZIP in-frame

121 (10.0%)

87 (16.6%)

16 (10.0%)

0.042

11 (3.8%)

7 (3.0%)

0.603

GATA2

84 (6.9%)

41 (7.8%)

15 (9.4%)

0.513

14 (4.8%)

14 (5.9%)

0.697

ETV6

18 (1.5%)

6 (1.1%)

6 (3.8%)

0.039

2 (0.7%)

4 (1.7%)

0.416

RUNX1

165 (13.6%)

0 (0%)

60 (37.5%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

105 (44.3%)

<0.001

Chromatin modifiers

ASXL1

161 (13.3%)

0 (0%)

57 (35.6%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

104 (43.9%)

<0.001

BOCR

32 (2.6%)

0 (0%)

16 (10.0%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

16 (6.8%)

<0.001

EZH2

19 (1.6%)

0 (0%)

7 (4.4%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

12 (5.1%)

<0.001

Spliceosome complex genes

SF3B1

33 (2.7%)

0 (0%)

10 (6.3%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

23 (9.7%)

<0.001

SRSF2

80 (6.6%)

0 (0%)

8 (5.0%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

72 (30.4%)

<0.001

U2AF1

41 (3.4%)

0 (0%)

23 (14.4%)

<0.001

0 (0%)

18 (7.6%)

<0.001

ZRSR2

18 (1.5%)

0 (0%)

5 (3.1%)

0.001

0 (0%)

13 (5.5%)

<0.001

  1. aThree patients with FLT3-ITD did not have allelic ratio data. All three young patients had no MDS-R mutations.
  2. bDefined as FLT3 mutated/wild-type allelic ratio ≥ 0.5.