Table 2 CAR-T treatment history prior to loncastuximab treatment.

From: Outcomes with loncastuximab tesirine following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

 

Loncastuximab line of therapy

 

3rd Line N = 95 (%)

4th Line N = 23 (%)

2nd Line CAR-T

 CAR-T product

  Axicabtagene ciloleucel

62 (65%)

  Lisocabtagene maraleucel

33 (35%)

Best response to 2nd line CAR-T

 Complete response

23 (24%)

 Partial response

44 (46%)

 Stable disease

11 (12%)

 Progressive disease

16 (17%)

 Unknown

1 (1%)

3rd Line CAR-T

 CAR-T product

  

  Axicabtagene ciloleucel

18 (78%)

  Tisagenlecleucel

5 (22%)

Best response to 3rd line CAR-T

 Complete response

12 (52%)

 Partial response

5 (22%)

 Stable disease

4 (17%)

 Progressive disease

2 (9%)

Refractory to CAR-T

 No. with response status

94a

23

 CAR-T responders

67 (71%)

17 (74%)

 Refractory to CAR-T

27 (29%)

6 (26%)

Bridging therapy to CAR-T

 Yes

12 (13%)

13 (57%)

 No

78 (82%)

7 (30%)

 Unknown

5 (5%)

3 (13%)

Time from CAR-T infusion to progression, days

 No. with recorded dates

55

8

 Mean (SD)

135.7 (113.3)

198.9 (98.2)

 Median (Q1, Q3)

123.0 (42.0, 198.0)

221.5 (150.8, 254.5)

Time from CAR-T infusion to loncastuximab initiation, days

 No. with recorded dates

75

9

 Mean (SD)

205.7 (147.8)

266.0 (109.4)

 Median (Q1, Q3)

203.0 (92.0, 280.0)

297.0 (215.5, 358.0)

  1. Abbreviations: CAR-T chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, Q1 first quartile, 25th percentile, Q3 third quartile, 75th percentile, SD standard deviation.
  2. aCAR-T response was unknown for n = 1 in those receiving CAR-T in the 2 L setting.