Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Umbilical cord blood transplants facilitated by the French cord blood banks network. On behalf of the Agency of Biomedicine, Eurocord and the French society of bone marrow transplant and cell therapy (SFGM-TC)

Abstract

The public French Cord Blood Banks Network was established in 1999 with the objective of standardizing the practices governing umbilical cord blood (UCB) banking in France. The Network adopted a strategy to optimize its inventory and improve the quality of its banked units based on a quality improvement process using outcome data regularly provided by Eurocord. This study aimed to describe the results, over 10 years, of UCBT facilitated by a national network that used the same criteria of UCB collection and banking and to assess how modifications of banking criteria and unit selection might influence transplant outcomes. Nine hundred and ninety-nine units (593 single-unit and 203 double-unit grafts) were released by the Network to transplant 796 patients with malignant (83%) and non-malignant (17%) diseases. Median cell dose exceeded 3.5 × 107 TNC/kg in 86%. There was a trend to select units more recently collected and with higher cell dose. Neutrophil engraftment was 88.2% (85.7–90.7) and 79.3% (72.6–86.5) respectively for malignant and non-malignant diseases with a trend to faster recovery with higher cell doses. The respective 3-year transplant-related mortality were 31.1% (27.5–35.1) and 34.3% (27.0–43.5). OS was 49% ± 4 in malignant and 62% ± 4 in non-malignant disorders. In multivariate analysis, cell dose was the only unit-related factor associated with outcomes. Our results reflect the benefit on clinical outcomes of the strategy adopted by the Network to bank units with higher cell counts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The Network inventory (2008–2017).
Fig. 2: Percentage of UCB units released yearly.
Fig. 3: Probabilities of 3-year overall survival by transplant period.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HE, Auerbach AD, Friedman HS, Douglas GW, Devergie A, et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi’s anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N. Engl J Med. 1989;321:1174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gluckman E, Rocha V. Cord blood transplantation: state of the art. Haematologica. 2009;94:451–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gluckman E, Ruggeri A, Volt F, Cunha R, Boudjedir K, Rocha V. Milestones in umbilical cord blood transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2011;154:441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballen KK, Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HE. Umbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond. Blood. 2013;122:491–498.

  5. Barker JN, Kurtzberg J, Ballen K, Boo M, Brunstein C, Cutler C, et al. Optimal practices in unrelated donor cord blood transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:882–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocha V, Wagner JE, Sobocinski KA, Klein JP, Zhang M-J, Horowitz MM, et al. Graft-versus-host disease in children who have received a cord-blood or bone marrow transplant from an hla-identical sibling. N. Engl J Med. 2000;342:1846–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N. Engl J Med. 2004;351:2276–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weisdorf D, Eapen M, Ruggeri A, Zhang M-J, Zhong X, Brunstein C, et al. Alternative donor transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research-eurocord analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2014;20:816–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruggeri A, Sanz G, Bittencourt H, Sanz J, Rambaldi A, Volt F, et al. Comparison of outcomes after single or double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia using different types of myeloablative conditioning regimen, a retrospective study on behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT. Leukemia. 2014;28:779–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang M-J, Champlin RE, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N. Engl J Med. 2004;351:2265–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J, et al. Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood. 2011;118:282–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocha V, Gluckman E, on behalf of the Eurocord-Netcord registry and European Blood and Marrow Transplant group. Improving outcomes of cord blood transplantation: HLA matching, cell dose and other graft- and transplantation-related factors. Br J Haematol. 2009;147:262–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barker JN, Scaradavou A, Stevens CE. Combined effect of total nucleated cell dose and HLA match on transplantation outcome in 1061 cord blood recipients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2010;115:1843–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eapen M, Klein JP, Sanz GF, Spellman S, Ruggeri A, Anasetti C, et al. Effect of donor-recipient HLA matching at HLA A, B, C, and DRB1 on outcomes after umbilical-cord blood transplantation for leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:1214–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Eapen M, Klein JP, Ruggeri A, Spellman S, Lee SJ, Anasetti C, et al. Impact of allele-level HLA matching on outcomes after myeloablative single unit umbilical cord blood transplantation for hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2014;123:133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eapen M, Wang T, Veys PA, Boelens JJ, St Martin A, Spellman S, et al. Allele-level HLA matching for umbilical cord blood transplantation for non-malignant diseases in children: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e325–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruggeri A. Optimizing cord blood selection. Hematology. 2019;2019:522–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dehn J, Spellman S, Hurley CK, Shaw BE, Barker JN, Burns LJ, et al. Selection of unrelated donors and cord blood units for hematopoietic cell transplantation: guidelines from the NMDP/CIBMTR. Blood. 2019;134:924–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Étude de législation comparée n° 187 - septembre 2008 - La conservation du sang placentaire. https://www.senat.fr/lc/lc187/lc187_mono.html. 2008.

  20. International standards for cord blood collection, banking and release for administration, accreditation manual. http://www.factwebsite.org/uploadedFiles/Standards/NetCord%20FACT%206th%20Ed%20Manual%20Draft.09.01.15.pdf.

  21. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin PJ, Weisdorf D, Przepiorka D, Hirschfeld S, Farrell A, Rizzo JD, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. Design of Clinical Trials Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2006;12:491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Savani BN, Niittyvuopio R, Blaise D, Craddock C, et al. Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-0803-y.

  24. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner JE, Broxmeyer HE, Byrd RL, Zehnbauer B, Schmeckpeper B, Shah N, et al. Transplantation of umbilical cord blood after myeloablative therapy: analysis of engraftment. Blood. 1992;79:1874–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wagner JohnE, Steinbuch M, Kernan NancyA, Broxmayer HalE, Gluckman E. Allogeneic sibling umbilical-cord-blood transplantation in children with malignant and non-malignant disease. Lancet. 1995;346:214–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurtzberg J, Laughlin M, Graham ML, Smith C, Olson JF, Halperin EC, et al. Placental blood as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation into unrelated recipients. N. Engl J Med. 1996;335:157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N. Engl J Med. 1998;339:1565–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Broxmeyer HE, Lee M-R, Hangoc G, Cooper S, Prasain N, Kim Y-J, et al. Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, and isolation of endothelial progenitors from 21- to 23.5-year cryopreserved cord blood. Blood. 2011;117:4773–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rubinstein P, Dobrila L, Rosenfield RE, Adamson JW, Migliaccio G, Migliaccio AR, et al. Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10119–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubinstein P, Taylor PE, Scaradavou A, Adamson JW, Migliaccio G, Emanuel D, et al. Unrelated placental blood for bone marrow reconstitution: organization of the placental blood program. Blood Cells. 1994;20:587–96 ; discussion 596-600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Navarrete C, Contreras M. Cord blood banking: a historical perspective. Br J Haematol. 2009;147:236–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lazzari L, Corsini C, Curioni C, Lecchi L, Scalamogna M, Rebulla P, et al. The Milan Cord Blood Bank and the Italian Cord Blood Network. J Hematother. 1996;5:117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Navarrete C, Warwick R, Armitage S, Fehily D, Contreras M. The London Cord Blood Bank. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1998;22:S6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Querol S, Gabarró M, Amat L, Gonzalez S, Gomez MD, de la Calle O, et al. The placental blood program of the Barcelona Cord Blood Bank. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1998;22:S3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dal Cortivo L, Marolleau JP, Gluckman E, Chavinié J, Brossard Y, Benbunan M. The Paris Cord Blood Bank. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1998;22:S11.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wernet PW. The International Netcord Foundation. In: Broxmeyer He, editor. Cord blood: biology, immunology, banking and clinical transplantation. Bethesda, Md: Aabb Press; 2004. P. 429–35.

  39. WMDA report. Total Number of Donors and Cord blood units. https://statistics.wmda.info/;https://wmda.info/cord-blood/basics-cord-blood/; 2020.

  40. Mayani H, Wagner JE, Broxmeyer HE. Cord blood research, banking, and transplantation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55:48–61.

  41. Magalon J, Gamerre M, Picard C, Chabannon C. Increase the quality of banked cord blood units without limiting HLA diversity: how cord blood banks could face this dilemma. Transfus. 2014;54:495–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stritesky G, Wadsworth K, Duffy M, Buck K, Dehn J. Evaluation of the impact of banking umbilical cord blood units with high cell dose for ethnically diverse patients. Transfus. 2018;58:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Querol S, Gomez SG, Pagliuca A, Torrabadella M, Madrigal JA. Quality rather than quantity: the cord blood bank dilemma. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2010;45:970–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Feve F, Cambon-Thomsen A, Eliaou J-F, Gourraud P-A, Raffoux C, Florens J-P. Economic evaluation of the organization of a registry of haematopoietic stem cell donors. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007;55:275–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruggeri A, Paviglianiti A, Gluckman E, Rocha V. Impact of HLA in cord blood transplantation outcomes. HLA. 2016;87:413–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hough R, Danby R, Russell N, Marks D, Veys P, Shaw B, et al. Recommendations for a standard UK approach to incorporating umbilical cord blood into clinical transplantation practice: an update on cord blood unit selection, donor selection algorithms and conditioning protocols. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:360–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gutman JA, Ross K, Smith C, Myint H, Lee C-K, Salit R, et al. Chronic graft versus host disease burden and late transplant complications are lower following adult double cord blood versus matched unrelated donor peripheral blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:1588–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lazaryan A, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor T, Brunstein CG, MacMillan ML, Bejanyan N, et al. Risk factors for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with umbilical cord blood and matched sibling donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22:134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, Woolfrey A, Flowers ME, Doney K, et al. Cord-blood transplantation in patients with minimal residual disease. N. Engl J Med. 2016;375:944–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Veys P, Danby R, Vora A, Slatter M, Wynn R, Lawson S, et al. UK experience of unrelated cord blood transplantation in paediatric patients. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pupella S, Bianchi M, Ceccarelli A, Calteri D, Lombardini L, Giornetti A, et al. A cost analysis of public cord blood banks belonging to the Italian Cord Blood Network. Blood Transfus. Trasfus Sangue. 2018;16:313–20.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sacchi N. Is it time to re-think a sustainable banking model for the Italian Cord Blood Network? Blood Transfus Trasfus Sangue. 2018;16:221–3.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Querol S, Rubinstein P, Marsh SGE, Goldman J, Madrigal JA. Cord blood banking: ‘providing cord blood banking for a nation. Br J Haematol. 2009;147:227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Magalon J, Maiers M, Kurtzberg J, Navarrete C, Rubinstein P, Brown C, et al. Banking or bankrupting: strategies for sustaining the economic future of public cord blood banks. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rubinstein P. Cord blood banking for clinical transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2009;44:635–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Allan D, Kiernan J, Gragert L, Dibdin N, Bartlett D, Campbell T, et al. Reducing ethnic disparity in access to high-quality HLA-matched cord blood units for transplantation: analysis of the Canadian Blood Services’ Cord Blood Bank inventory. Transfus. 2019;59:2382–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mugishima H, Takahashi T, Nagamura T, Asano S, Saito H. Umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow replacement; Asia bank and Japan cord blood bank network update. Int J Hematol. 2002;76:284–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kodera Y. The Japan Marrow Donor Program, the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network and the Asia Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2008;42:S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Barker JN, Boughan K, Dahi PB, Devlin SM, Maloy MA, Naputo K, et al. Racial disparities in access to HLA-matched unrelated donor transplants: a prospective 1312-patient analysis. Blood Adv. 2019;3:939–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bochtler W, Maiers M, Oudshoorn M et al. World Marrow Donor Association guidelines for use of HLA nomenclature and its validation in the data exchange among hematopoietic stem cell donor registries and cord blood banks. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;39: 737–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705672.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Sergi Querol for his assistance in accessing data from the Antony Nolan and REDMO registries and to acknowledge the work of Ms Cristina Fusté (Data manager at REDMO, Spanish Bone Marrow Registry), and Mr Mahamadou Sinayako (Biostatistician at the ABM, SYRENAD Registry) who have provided the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanadi Rafii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafii, H., Garnier, F., Ruggeri, A. et al. Umbilical cord blood transplants facilitated by the French cord blood banks network. On behalf of the Agency of Biomedicine, Eurocord and the French society of bone marrow transplant and cell therapy (SFGM-TC). Bone Marrow Transplant 56, 2497–2509 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01313-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01313-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links