Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Extramedullary disease but not paraskeletal disease portends inferior outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in multiple myeloma

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is effective for multiple myeloma (MM), yet patients with plasmacytomas, either paraskeletal disease (PSD) or extramedullary disease (EMD), have poorer outcomes. To better distinguish the effects of EMD and PSD on outcomes, we conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 134 relapsed/refractory MM patients treated with CAR T cells. With a median follow-up of 30.2 months, patients with EMD (n = 34) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with bone marrow-only disease (n = 75): PFS was 24.2 months vs. 9.0 months (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.31–3.54), and OS was not reached vs. 24.0 months (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.81–7.94). In contrast, patients with PSD did not experience significantly shorter PFS or OS. Among patients with EMD, those with high extramedullary tumor burden had a lower overall response rate (ORR). For extramedullary tumor burden <25 cm2, 25–50 cm2, and >50 cm2, ORR was 81.0% (66.7% complete response, CR), 83.3% (50% CR), and 57.1% (0% CR), respectively. Importantly, EMD-positive relapses post-CAR T cell therapy comprised half of all relapses observed. In summary, our findings indicate that EMD, but not PSD, is strongly associated with poor outcomes with CAR T cell therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Outcomes by presence of extramedullary or paraskeletal disease.
Fig. 2: Best response by extramedullary disease burden.
Fig. 3: Outcomes by location of extramedullary disease.
Fig. 4: Sankey plot for extramedullary disease pre- and post-CAR T.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data generated or analyzed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:705–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, Jakubowiak A, Agha M, Cohen AD, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet. 2021;398:314–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bansal R, Rakshit S, Kumar S. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bladé J, Beksac M, Caers J, Jurczyszyn A, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Moreau P, et al. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review. Blood Cancer J. 2022;12:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinstock M, Ghobrial IM. Extramedullary multiple myeloma. Leuk lymphoma. 2013;54:1135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosiñol L, Beksac M, Zamagni E, Van de Donk NW, Anderson KC, Badros A, et al. Expert review on soft‐tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment and treatment considerations. Br J Haematol. 2021;194:496–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pour L, Sevcikova S, Greslikova H, Kupska R, Majkova P, Zahradova L, et al. Soft-tissue extramedullary multiple myeloma prognosis is significantly worse in comparison to bone-related extramedullary relapse. Haematologica. 2014;99:360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Batsukh K, Lee S-E, Min GJ, Park SS, Jeon Y-W, Yoon J-H, et al. Distinct clinical outcomes between paramedullary and extramedullary lesions in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Immune Netw. 2017;17:250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashmi H, Hansen DK, Peres LC, Puglianini OC, Freeman C, De Avila G, et al. Factors associated with refractoriness or early progression after idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium real world experience. Haematologica. 2024;109:1514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, Spencer A, Anguille S, Mateos M-V, et al. Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335–47.

  11. Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, Patel K, Cavo M, Nooka AK, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1002–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–e46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin Y, Raje NS, Berdeja JG, Siegel DS, Jagannath S, Madduri D, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc 18-month follow-up of a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:2286–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zanwar S, Sidana S, Shune L, Puglianini OC, Pasvolsky O, Gonzalez R, et al. Impact of extramedullary multiple myeloma on outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17:42.

  15. Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, Agha M, Cohen AD, Hari P, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti–B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 2-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1265–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dima D, Abdallah A-O, Davis JA, Awada H, Goel U, Rashid A, et al. Impact of extraosseous extramedullary disease on outcomes of patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma receiving standard-of-care chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zugasti I, Tormo-Ratera M, Oliver-Caldes A, Soler-Perromat JC, Gonzalez-Calle V, Moreno DF, et al. Clinical impact of [18F] FDG-PET/CT in ARI0002h treatment, a CAR-T against BCMA for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2025;9:571–82 .

  18. Billecke L, Murga Penas EM, May AM, Engelhardt M, Nagler A, Leiba M, et al. Cytogenetics of extramedullary manifestations in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2013;161:87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Besse L, Sedlarikova L, Greslikova H, Kupska R, Almasi M, Penka M, et al. Cytogenetics in multiple myeloma patients progressing into extramedullary disease. Eur J Haematol. 2016;97:93–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avivi I, Cohen YC, Suska A, Shragai T, Mikala G, Garderet L, et al. Hematogenous extramedullary relapse in multiple myeloma‐a multicenter retrospective study in 127 patients. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:1132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dahl IMS, Rasmussen T, Kauric G, Husebekk A. Differential expression of CD56 and CD44 in the evolution of extramedullary myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2002;116:273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kremer M, Ott G, Nathrath M, Specht K, Stecker K, Alexiou C, et al. Primary extramedullary plasmacytoma and multiple myeloma: phenotypic differences revealed by immunohistochemical analysis. J Pathol: A J Pathol Soc Gt Br Irel. 2005;205:92–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. John M, Helal M, Duell J, Mattavelli G, Stanojkovska E, Afrin N, et al. Spatial transcriptomics reveals profound subclonal heterogeneity and T-cell dysfunction in extramedullary myeloma. Blood J. 2024;144:2121–35.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their gratitude to their patients and caregivers who made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DP conceptualized the study, collected and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. SR conceptualized the study, analyzed and interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. THM collected data and edited the manuscript. TS, WF, and EM analyzed and interpreted data and edited the manuscript. JR, SP, SJ, ACR, LJS, ST, CS, and HJC reviewed and edited the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shambavi Richard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DP: Honoraria from Sanofi. THM: Advisory board fees for Sanofi. JR: Consultant/advisory board: Janssen, BMS, Pfizer, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda, Genentech, Abbvie, Regeneron, Forus, Menarini, Speakers Bureau: Janssen, BMS, Sanofi, Adaptive Biotechnologies. SP: Advisory board for Grail; research support from Celgene/BMS Corporation, Grail, Caribou. SJ: Consulting for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Poseida Therapeutics; Advisory board for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, BMS, GSK; Data Safety Monitoring Board for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Genmab. LJS: Consulting/advisory board for Janssen Pharmaceuticals. CR: Advisory board for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Amgen, Karyopharm Therapeutics. ACR: Consulting for Johnson & Johnson, Adaptive, BMS, Sanofi. HJC: Employment: The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Research funding: Genentech/Roche, BMS, Takeda. The remaining authors declare no relevant competing financial interests.

Ethics approval

Patient data was retrospectively collected and analyzed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. As many patients were deceased, obtaining informed consent was not possible. Therefore, a waiver of informed consent was granted, and the study was approved by the institutional review board of Mount Sinai (IRB#11-01978-MOD0013).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, D., Mouhieddine, T.H., Sheng, T. et al. Extramedullary disease but not paraskeletal disease portends inferior outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 60, 1114–1119 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-025-02593-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-025-02593-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links