Table 1 Comparison of different response strategy types
From: Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration
Response strategy types | Typical methods or materials | Features and advantages | Existing problems | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
External stimuli-responsive strategies | ||||
Photoresponsive strategy | Loading photothermal agents as follows: (1) gold nanostructures (2) transition metal sulfides and oxides (e.g., CuFeSe2 nanocrystals, Fe3O4 NPs, and copper silicate microspheres) (3) organic NPs (4) carbon-based NPs and graphene (5) MXenes and single-elemental nanosheets (e.g., black phosphorus nanosheets) | (1) noninvasive with high controllability (2) remarkable photothermal therapy effects | (1) low tissue penetration (2) intense photothermal effect may cause damage to the surrounding normal tissue (3) potential toxicity with the use of photoactivated materials | |
Magnetic field-responsive strategy | Loading magnetic materials or thermally sensitive agents such as Fe3O4 NPs, MnFe3O4 NPs, or Fe3O4 NPs, and so on | (1) high tissue-penetrating capabilities (2) noninvasive with high controllability (3) harmless to normal tissues | (1) the magnetic heat was not uniform (2) the high local heat could cause thermal damage to surrounding tissue | |
Ultrasound-responsive strategy | Employing the effect of ultrasound activating sonosensitizers for therapy | (1) remarkable tissue penetration depth (2) noninvasive (3) no drug resistance | (1) low in vivo stability of sonosensitizer drugs (2) potential toxicity of sonosensitizers | |
Electroresponsive strategy | Loading electroactive materials, such as carbon nanotubes, metal, graphene, inorganic electroactive materials, and conductive polymers | (1) improved conductive characteristics (2) remarkable tissue regeneration effect | (1) cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability remain uncertain (2) low control precision | |
Piezoelectricity-responsive strategy | Loading piezoelectric biomaterials, including piezo-bioceramics and some piezo-biopolymers | (1) improved conductive characteristics (2) remarkable regeneration effect without extraneous drugs or growth factors | (1) densification, volatilization of alkali, and high temperature in synthesis processes (2) long-term biosafety and cytotoxicity remain uncertain | |
Mechanical stimuli-responsive strategy | Applying proper mechanical stimulus in the regeneration platform | remarkable regeneration effect without extraneous drug or growth factors | (1) optimal mechanical parameters, such as amplitude and frequency of mechanics, are still unknown (2) noninvasive application method to applied in the processes is still needed | |
Internal microenvironment stimuli-responsive strategy | ||||
Oxidative species-responsive strategy | Using excess endogenous ROS, such as peroxides, hydroxyl radical, superoxide, singlet oxygen and alpha-oxygen, as a trigger to enhance bone regeneration | (1) smart and rapid response according to the environment (2) remarkable regeneration result and therapeutical effect | (1) the small action range and short lifespan of ROS would greatly affect the stimuli effect (2) the effect will damage normal cells at the same time | |
Acidic environment-responsive strategy | Applying the strategy to respond to the mildly acidic environment in pathological conditions, such as chronic inflammation, infected environment, or tumor environment | (1) smart and rapid response to the environment (2) change the local acid environment to facilitate bone regeneration | (1) the duration of action may not be long enough for effective therapy (2) the persistent acidic environment may impede further bone regeneration | |
Endogenous electric field-responsive strategy | Response to endogenous electric fields and repairing the physiological electric microenvironment to enhance the bone regeneration | (1) smart and rapid response according to the environment (2) change the local environment to facilitate further bone regeneration | (1) the long-term toxicity of the novel biomaterial need to be lucubrated (2) the long-term control of the stimulus intensity remains uncertain | |
Specific ionic concentration-responsive strategy | Using the specific ionic concentration as a biological trigger to enhance bone regeneration | (1) rapid and smart response according to the ionic concentration (2) change the ionic concentration to facilitate bone regeneration | (1) the action duration of action may not be long enough for effective therapy (2) the stimulus intensity was not enough for effective therapy | |
Specific enzyme-responsive strategy | Applying the strategy to smart response to the enzyme specifically secrete in different disease statues (MMPs in tumor statues, glutamyl endonuclease in infection statues, etc.) | (1) remarkable selectivity for their substrates (2) specific and sophisticated process | (1) the overlapping substrates between similar enzyme families would affect the specificity (2) the biocompatibility and long-term cytotoxicity still need to be evaluated (3) enzyme dysregulation will affect the action time | |
Specific immune environment-responsive strategy | Response to different pathological immune environments by various methods such as developing drug delivery systems, exploiting novel immunomodulatory biomaterials, and applying novel coatings | (1) smart and rapid response according to the specific immune environment (2) remarkable tissue regeneration effect | (1) the unrestricted activation of macrophages may damage the host immune homeostasis (2) improperly polarized macrophages may evoke the osteoclast formation and reduce osteolysis (3) the lowest concentration of IL-4 released needs to be further confirmed |