Table 2 Radiographic features and bone mineral density of subjects with the CCN2 variant

From: A monoallelic variant in CCN2 causes an autosomal dominant spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with low bone mass

Subject, Age (year)/ Sexa

Radiographic features

Bone mineral densityb

Spine deformity

Abnormal metaphyses

Irregular epiphyses

OA like changes

Other

L1-4/ (g/cm2)

Z-scores/ T-scores

Neck/ (g/cm2)

Z-scores/ T-scores

Total/ (g/cm2)

Z-scores/ T-scores

II-2, 70.0/F

platyspondyly

+

N/A

+

SFN

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

II-7, 56.9/M

platyspondyly

+

N/A

+

SFN

0.734

−2.4/−2.9

0.585

−2.2/−3.0

0.615

−2.6/−2.9

II-10, 53.7/F

platyspondyly

+

N/A

+

SFN

0.767

−1.2/−2.9

0.689

−0.6/−2.0

0.691

−1.1/−2.2

III-2, 44.6/F

platyspondyly, mild scoliosis

+

N/A

+

SFN

0.875

−2.4/−2.0

0.638

−2.4/−2.4

0.756

−1.8/−1.7

III-4, 41.4/F

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.842

−1.7/−2.3

0.679

−1.6/−2.1

0.800

−0.9/−1.3

III-5, 39.5/M

N/A

+

N/A

+

N/A

0.701

−2.7/−3.2

0.633

−2.2/−2.7

0.678

−2.3/−2.4

III-8, 33.3/F

platyspondyly

+

N/A

-

-

0.945

−0.7/−1.4

0.640

−1.9/−2.4

0.632

−2.2/−2.6

III-9, 28.9/M

platyspondyly, ISEP

+

N/A

+

SFN

1.094

0.1/0.1

0.849

−1.0/−1.0

0.893

−0.8/−0.8

III-13, 25.7/M

platyspondyly, ISEP

+

N/A

+

SFN

1.053

−0.3/−0.2

0.803

−1.5/−1.3

0.829

−1.3/−1.2

IV-4, 15.1/M

platyspondyly, mild scoliosis

+

+

-

SFN

0.861

N/A

0.797

N/A

0.798

N/A

IV-5, 4.6/M

BSVB

+

+

-

IAPF

0.416

N/A

0.576

N/A

0.553

N/A

IV-6, 6.3/F

BSVB

+

+

-

IAPF

0.574

N/A

0.537

N/A

0.467

N/A

  1. F female, M male, OA osteoarthritis, L1-4 lumber spine 1–4, Neck femoral neck, Total total hip, ISEP irregular sclerotic end plates, BSVB bullet-shaped vertebral bodies, SFN short femoral necks, IAPF irregular acetabulum and proximal femur, N/A not available, + denotes yes, – denotes unobserved
  2. aRoman numerals indicate generation, and arabic numbers indicate the order of offspring within a generation
  3. bBone mineral density was qualified using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and Z-scores/T-scores were calculated based on equipment-specific references27