Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Dental indemnity

Dental indemnity - some thoughts from MDDUS

Key points

  • Provides awareness of professionalism.

  • Provides information about dental indemnity.

  • Raises awareness of individual responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. British Dental Journal. Volume 236, Issue 8. 26 April 2024.

  2. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582.

  3. Hunter v Hanley [1955] SC 200.

  4. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.

  5. Gallacher v Clement [2025] SC EDIN 35.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Kaney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaney, H. Dental indemnity - some thoughts from MDDUS. Br Dent J 239, 410–411 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-025-9206-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-025-9206-1

Search

Quick links