Table 3 Performance comparison between TSP-based and clinicopathological nomogram.
Models | AUROC (95% CI) | P |
---|---|---|
Training cohort | ||
TSP-based nomogram | 0.846 (0.807–0.886) | <0.001 |
Clinicopathological nomogram | 0.735 (0.683–0.786) | |
Validation cohort | ||
TSP-based nomogram | 0.809 (0.745–0.872) | 0.002 |
Clinicopathological nomogram | 0.698 (0.621–0.774) | |
Total cohort | ||
TSP-based nomogram | 0.830 (0.800–0.859) | <0.001 |
Clinicopathological nomogram | 0.721 (0.684–0.758) |