Table 2 Univariable analysis of clinical and molecular factors associated with CB vs. NCB, PFS and OS.

From: A model combining clinical and genomic factors to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial carcinoma

 

Clinical benefit (odds ratio for CB vs. NCB)

PFS, hazard ratio

OS, hazard ratio

 

Univariable (95% CI) [p-value]

Univariable (95% CI) [p-value]

Univariable (95% CI) [p-value]

Age

1.02 (0.98 1.06) [0.42]

Previous lines (≥1 vs. 0)

0.89 (0.33 2.44) [0.83]

Neut./lymph ratio Continuous variable

0.77 (0.60 0.99) [0.04]

1.12 (1.01 1.24) [0.03]

Haemoglobin Continuous variable

1.54 (1.10 2.17) [0.01]

0.77 (0.65 0.91) [0.002]

0.69 (0.54 0.88) [0.003]

Platelet count Continuous variable

0.997 (0.991 1.003) [0.32]

1.003 (1.00 1.01) [0.07]

1.003 (1.00 1.01) [0.16]

Tract (bladder vs. UTUC)

2.31 (0.65 8.24) [0.20]

0.62 (0.32 1.21) [0.16]

1.53 (0.52 4.53) [0.44]

Gender

0.82 (0.26 2.61) [0.73]

1.24 (0.63 2.44) [0.53]

1.13 (0.46 2.77) [0.80]

ECOG PS (≥1 vs. 0)

0.14 (0.05 0.46) [0.001]

3.00 (1.48 6.06) [0.002]

6.19 (1.93 19.86) [0.002]

Visceral/LN Mets.

0.03 (0.01 0.17) [<0.001]

6.91 (2.44 19.57) [<0.001]

14.49 (1.91 110.07) [0.010]

Genomic variable

SNV count/TMB Continuous variable

1.36 (1.16 1.60) [<0.001]

0.88 (0.82 0.95) [ < 0.001]

0.94 (0.86 1.02) [0.14]

CNV count Continuous variable

0.40 (0.20 0.81) [0.01]

1.42 (1.11 1.81) [0.01]

1.12 (0.78 1.63) [0.54]

C>T CpG signature mutations Continuous variable

0.89 (0.78 1.02) [0.11]

0.96 (0.81 1.15) [0.69]

ERCC2 signature mutations Continuous variable

0.95 (0.77 1.16) [0.60]

APOBEC signature mutations Continuous variable

1.31 (1.09 1.58) [0.004]

0.91 (0.81 1.03) [0.15]

CDKN2B homozygous deletion

0.08 (0.01 0.69) [0.02]

3.84 (1.93 7.61) [<0.001]

4.12 (1.64 10.34) [0.003]

DDR deleterious alterations (Yes vs. No)

3.07 (0.98 9.59) [0.14]

0.61 (0.23, 1.62) [0.55]

  1. –Variable with 0 coefficients from penalised regression