Table 4 Associations of all cancers, screen-detected, interval, node-negative, node-positive and combined (node-positive or interval) cancers with continuous breast density measures.

From: Quantitative breast density analysis to predict interval and node-positive cancers in pursuit of improved screening protocols: a case–control study

 

Mean

Mean

Difference

CI

p-value

AUC

95% CIa

p-valueb

 

Controls

All cancers

     

p < 0.01

FGV (cm3)

53.7

66.3

12.6

(8.1, 17.1)

p < 0.01

0.63

(0.59, 0.67)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

9.2

1.0

(0.3, 1.7)

p < 0.01

0.56

(0.51, 0.60)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

48.2

3.8

(1.3, 6.4)

p < 0.01

0.55

(0.51, 0.59)

 
 

Controls

Screen-detected

     

p < 0.01

FGV (cm3)

53.7

64.4

10.8

(5.0, 16.5)

p < 0.01

0.61

(0.56, 0.66)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

8.1

−0.1

(−0.9, 0.8)

p = 0.87

0.51

(0.46, 0.56)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

44.1

−0.3

(−3.3, 2.7)

p = 0.84

0.50

(0.46, 0.55)

 
 

Controls

Interval cancers

     

p = 0.06

FGV (cm3)

53.7

68.2

14.5

(8.9, 20.1)

p < 0.01

0.65

(0.60, 0.70)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

10.3

2.1

(1.2, 3.0)

p < 0.01

0.63

(0.58, 0.68)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

52.4

8.1

(5.0, 11.1)

p < 0.01

0.60

(0.56, 0.65)

 
 

Controls

Node-negative cancers

     

p < 0.01

FGV (cm3)

53.7

64.1

10.4

(5.8, 15.0)

p < 0.01

0.62

(0.58, 0.67)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

8.8

0.6

(−0.2, 1.4)

p = 0.13

0.54

(0.49, 0.59)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

47.5

3.1

(0.2, 6.0)

p = 0.04

0.54

(0.50, 0.58)

 
 

Controls

Node-positive cancers

     

p < 0.01

FGV (cm3)

53.7

71.7

18.0

(9.5, 26.4)

p < 0.01

0.65

(0.59, 0.71)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

10.1

1.9

(0.7, 3.1)

p < 0.01

0.60

(0.54, 0.66)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

49.3

4.9

(1.6, 8.2)

p < 0.01

0.56

(0.51, 0.61)

 
 

Controls

Combined

     

p < 0.05

FGV (cm3)

53.7

69.2

15.5

(9.8, 21.2)

p < 0.01

0.65

(0.60, 0.69)

 

VBD (%)

8.2

10.0

1.8

(0.9, 2.7)

p < 0.01

0.61

(0.56, 0.66)

 

VAS (%)

44.4

50.5

6.2

(3.4, 9.0)

p < 0.01

0.58

(0.54, 0.62)

 
  1. a95% Confidence intervals that do not include 0.50 demonstrate a statistically significantly better discriminatory ability compared to chance.
  2. bThis p-value reflects whether there is a statistically significant difference between the AUCs of the continuous quantitative BD measurements.