Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies

Prognostic significance of PET/CT and its association with immuno-genomic profiling in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy: results from a phase II study

Abstract

Background

A phase II trial (EC-CRT-001) demonstrated the promising efficacy of combining toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Biomarkers are key to identifying patients who may benefit from this therapeutic approach.

Methods

Of the 42 patients with ESCC who received toripalimab combined with definitive CRT, 37 were included in this analysis. Baseline assessments included PET/CT metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG), RNA sequencing of tumour biopsies to quantify the tissue mutational burden (TMB), and multiplex immunofluorescence staining to estimate immune cell infiltration in the tumour microenvironment (TME). Frozen neoplastic samples were procured for RNA sequencing to further explore the immune-related TME.

Results

Among the 37 patients, high baseline SUVmax (≥12.0; OR = 6.5, 95% CI 1.4–48.2, p = 0.032) and TLG (≥121.8; OR = 6.8, 95% CI 1.6–33.5, p = 0.012) were significantly correlated with lower complete response rates. All five PET/CT parameters were notably associated with overall survival; only SUVmax and TLG were associated with a significantly worse progression-free survival. A trend towards an inverse correlation was observed between SUVmax and TMB (R = −0.33, p = 0.062). PD-1 + CD8 + T cell infiltration was negatively correlated with MTV (R = −0.355, p = 0.034) and TLG (R = −0.385, p = 0.021). Moreover, RNA sequencing revealed that the high TLG subgroup exhibited low immune cell infiltration, indicating an immunosuppressive landscape.

Conclusions

High baseline SUVmax and TLG might predict poorer treatment response and worse survival in patients with ESCC undergoing immunotherapy combined with CRT. In addition, high PET/CT metabolic parameters, particularly TLG, were correlated with an immunosuppressive TME, which warrants further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of complete response rates among patient subgroups delineated by optimal PET/CT parameter cut-offs.
Fig. 2: Overall survival of patients based on optimal PET/CT parameter cut-off values.
Fig. 3: Correlation between baseline PET/CT parameters and immune cell infiltration in the tumour microenvironment using multiplex immunofluorescence staining.
Fig. 4: Radiological and multiplex immunohistochemical images of two representative patients achieving complete response in TLG-low and TLG-high subgroups.
Fig. 5: Correlation between TLG and immune-related tumour microenvironment based on RNA-seq analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Individual data will be made available following publication upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conroy T, Galais MP, Raoul JL, Bouché O, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Douillard JY, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:305–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hulshof MCCM, Geijsen ED, Rozema T, Oppedijk V, Buijsen J, Neelis KJ, et al. Randomized study on dose escalation in definitive chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (ARTDECO Study). J Clin Oncol 2021. 2021;39:2816–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang ZX, Cui C, Yao J, Zhang Y, Li M, Feng J, et al. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JUPITER-06): a multi-center phase 3 trial. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, Xu J, Wyrwicz L, Motoyama S, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:449–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021;398:759–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah MA, Bennouna J, Doi T, Shen L, Kato K, Adenis A, et al. KEYNOTE-975 study design: a phase III study of definitive chemoradiotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2021;17:1143–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu R, Wang W, Li T, Li J, Zhao K, Wang W, et al. RATIONALE 311: tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2021;17:4081–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu Y, Wen J, Li Q, Chen B, Zhao L, Liu S, et al. Toripalimab combined with definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EC-CRT-001): a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:371–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han S, Kim YJ, Woo S, Suh CH, Lee JJ. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:887–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen X, Xu X, Wang D, Liu J, Sun J, Lu M, et al. Neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KEEP-G 03): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11:e005830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang W, Xing X, Yeung SCJ, Wang S, Chen W, Bao Y, et al. Neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 blockade combined with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e003497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chalmers ZR, Connelly CF, Fabrizio D, Gay L, Ali SM, Ennis R, et al. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med. 2017;9:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Moody SE, Dunn IF, et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature. 2009;462:108–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshihara K, Shahmoradgoli M, Martínez E, Vegesna R, Kim H, Torres-Garcia W, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Zhao S, Zheng Y, Han Y, Chen X, Cheng Z, et al. Preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PALACE-1). Eur J Cancer. 2021;144:232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aide N, Hicks RJ, Le Tourneau C, Lheureux S, Fanti S, Lopci E. FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy: report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:238–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beutler BD, Whang G, Tchelepi H. PET/CT ultrasound fusion for percutaneous biopsy: a retrospective single-center study and review of the literature. Clin Nucl Med. 2022;47:692–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frood R, Burton C, Tsoumpas C, Frangi AF, Gleeson F, Patel C, et al. Baseline PET/CT imaging parameters for prediction of treatment outcome in Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:3198–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonomo P, Merlotti A, Olmetto E, Bianchi A, Desideri I, Bacigalupo A, et al. What is the prognostic impact of FDG PET in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2122–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang WY, Tseng NC, Chen LY, Chang CW, Huang YY, Huang YT, et al. Comparison of the detection performance between FAP and FDG PET/CT in various cancers: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48:132–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horton BL, Morgan DM, Momin N, Zagorulya M, Torres-Mejia E, Bhandarkar V, et al. Lack of CD8+ T cell effector differentiation during priming mediates checkpoint blockade resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eabi8800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen YX, Wang ZX, Jin Y, Zhao Q, Liu ZX, Zuo ZX, et al. An immunogenic and oncogenic feature-based classification for chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:919–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang B, Qi L, Wang X, Xu J, Liu Y, Mu L, et al. Phase II clinical trial using camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Commun. 2020;40:711–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang X, Yang W, Zhou Q, Luo H, Chen W, Yeung SJ, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in combination with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:4241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi Y, Choi JY, Hong TH, Choi YL, Oh D, Woo SY, et al. Trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the role of volume-based PET/CT in patient management and prognostication. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:751–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haghighat Jahromi A, Barkauskas DA, Zabel M, Goodman AM, Frampton G, Nikanjam M, et al. Relationship between tumor mutational burden and maximum standardized uptake value in 2-[18F]FDG PET (positron emission tomography) scan in cancer patients. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon SH, Kim J, Joung JG, Cha H, Park WY, Ahn JS, et al. Correlations between metabolic texture features, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation burden in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:446–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Poetsch AR. The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:207–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi C, Tosolini M, Gravelle P, Pericart S, Kanoun S, Evrard S, et al. Baseline SUVmax is related to tumor cell proliferation and patient outcome in follicular lymphoma. Haematologica. 2020;107:221–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Togo M, Yokobori T, Shimizu K, Handa T, Kaira K, Sano T, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET to predict the tumour immune status defined by tumoural PD-L1 and CD8+tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020;122:1686–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nath K, Law SC, Sabdia MB, Gunawardana J, de Long LM, Sester D, et al. Intratumoral T cells have a differential impact on FDG-PET parameters in follicular lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2021;5:2644–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chow A, Perica K, Klebanoff CA, Wolchok JD. Clinical implications of T cell exhaustion for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:775–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ye L, Jiang Y, Zhang M. Crosstalk between glucose metabolism, lactate production and immune response modulation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;68:81–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82373214), Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (Y-MSDZD2022-0878), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515012483). We thank all participating patients, investigators, research staff, and members of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: YYH and MX; supply of study materials or patients: QQL, YJZ, MZL, YYH, and MX; gathering and compilation of data: RXW, SLL, BQC, QQL, XYC, YYH, and MX; Data analysis and interpretation: RXW, SLL, BQC, QQL, YYH, and MX; manuscript drafting and revision: all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mian Xi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Liu, S., Chen, B. et al. Prognostic significance of PET/CT and its association with immuno-genomic profiling in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy: results from a phase II study. Br J Cancer 131, 709–717 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02779-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02779-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links