Table 1 Relationship between ISL1 expression and clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer

From: ISL1 predicts poor outcomes for patients with gastric cancer and drives tumor progression through binding to the ZEB1 promoter together with SETD7

Clinicopathological features

ISL1 expression

P-value

Negative (%)

Positive (%)

Gender

  Male

65 (46.1%)

76 (53.9%)

0.413

  Female

27 (49.1%)

28 (50.9%)

Age, year

  ≤60

48 (51.5%)

46 (48.9%)

0.167

  >60

44 (43.1%)

58 (56.9%)

Primary tumor location

  Non-cardia

77 (49.4%)

79 (50.6%)

0.122

  Cardia

15 (37.5%)

25 (62.5%)

Tumor size (cm)

  ≤5

58 (45.6%)

67 (54.4%)

0.479

  >5

34 (49.3%)

37 (50.7%)

Lauren

  Intestinal/mixed

61 (63.9%)

36 (36.1%)

0.001

  Diffuse

22 (24.7%)

67 (75.3%)

  Mix

6 (85.7%)

1 (14.35%)

Vascular invasion

  Absent

61 (74.4%)

21 (25.6%)

0.001

  Present

30 (26.8%)

82 (773.24%)

Histological grade

  Poor

69 (65.7%)

36 (34.3%)

0.001

  Well-moderate

22 (24.4%)

68 (75.6%)

Depth of invasion

  T1 + T2

40 (80.8%)

10 (19.2%)

0.001

  T3 + T4

52 (34.7%)

94 (65.3%)

Lymph-node metastasis

  No

26 (65%)

14 (35%)

0.007

  Yes

65 (41.9%)

90 (58.1%)

Distant metastasis

  M0

90 (50.8%)

87 (49.2%)

0.001

  M1

2 (10.5%)

17 (89.5%)

TNM stage

  I

15 (78.9%)

4 (21.1%)

0.000

  II

18 (48.6%)

19 (51.4%)

  III

57 (47.1%)

64 (52.9%)

  IV

2 (10.5%)

17 (89.55%)