Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Cell Death & Disease
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. cell death & disease
  3. articles
  4. article
SNRPD2-mediated regulation of DDX39B splicing promotes endometrial cancer progression by suppressing the activation of CTSC cryptic exons
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 February 2026

SNRPD2-mediated regulation of DDX39B splicing promotes endometrial cancer progression by suppressing the activation of CTSC cryptic exons

  • Yingwei Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-221X1 na1,
  • Zhongshao Chen2 na1,
  • Yanling Liu3,
  • Yuehan Gao2,
  • Yingying Pu2,
  • Qianqian Gao2,
  • Feng Gao4,
  • Ning Yang2 &
  • …
  • Peng Li2 

Cell Death & Disease , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 120 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Endometrial cancer
  • RNAi

Abstract

Recent studies have reported the overexpression of Sm proteins in several cancers, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets; however, the specific Sm family members involved in endometrial cancer and their mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we show that the Sm protein SNRPD2 is markedly upregulated in both fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) endometrial cancer specimens and that its overexpression correlates with poorer clinical outcomes. In vitro and in vivo functional assays demonstrate that silencing SNRPD2 suppresses endometrial cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Specifically, antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) targeting SNRPD2 markedly reduced tumor growth in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. Mechanistic analyses reveal that SNRPD2 knockdown induces the retention of intron 5 in DDX39B, resulting in the production of a noncoding transcript that is degraded by the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway and thereby decreases DDX39B expression. Reduced DDX39B levels permit the activation of a cryptic exon (Exon 2_3) in the CTSC mRNA, which introduces premature termination codons (PTCs) and triggers additional NMD-mediated degradation, leading to decreased CTSC expression. Thus, SNRPD2 maintains high DDX39B expression by preventing intron retention, and in turn, elevated DDX39B expression suppresses cryptic exon usage in CTSC to preserve CTSC expression, ultimately supporting malignant phenotypes of endometrial cancer. These results define a novel SNRPD2–DDX39B–CTSC regulatory axis and identify SNRPD2 as a promising therapeutic target for endometrial cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

Targeting the splicing factor SNRPB inhibits endometrial cancer progression by retaining the POLD1 intron

Article Open access 05 February 2025

SNRPB-mediated regulation of DDX39A splicing promotes ovarian cancer progression by regulating α6 integrin subunit expression

Article 11 April 2025

SPTBN2 regulated by miR-424-5p promotes endometrial cancer progression via CLDN4/PI3K/AKT axis

Article Open access 09 December 2021

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, et al. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2021;7:88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salmon A, Lebeau A, Streel S, Dheur A, Schoenen S, Goffin F, et al. Locally advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer: current and emerging therapies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2024;129:102790.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Njoku K, Pierce A, Chiasserini D, Geary B, Campbell AE, Kelsall J, et al. Detection of endometrial cancer in cervico-vaginal fluid and blood plasma: leveraging proteomics and machine learning for biomarker discovery. EBioMedicine. 2024;102:105064.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75:10–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheikh MA, Althouse AD, Freese KE, Soisson S, Edwards RP, Welburn S, et al. USA endometrial cancer projections to 2030: should we be concerned?. Future Oncol. 2014;10:2561–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corr BR, Erickson BK, Barber EL, Fisher CM, Slomovitz B. Advances in the management of endometrial cancer. BMJ. 2025;388:e080978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Q, Ai Y, Abdel-Wahab O. Molecular impact of mutations in RNA splicing factors in cancer. Mol Cell. 2024;84:3667–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bradley RK, Anczukow O. RNA splicing dysregulation and the hallmarks of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23:135–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Q, Liao R, Miao C, Hasnat M, Li L, Sun L, et al. Oncofetal SNRPE promotes HCC tumorigenesis by regulating the FGFR4 expression through alternative splicing. Br J Cancer. 2024;131:77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang H, Beutler B, Zhang D. Emerging roles of spliceosome in cancer and immunity. Protein Cell. 2022;13:559–79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei L, Li Y, Chen J, Wang Y, Wu J, Yang H, et al. Alternative splicing in ovarian cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22:507.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Chen Z, Peng J, Yuan C, Yan S, Yang N, et al. The splicing factor SNRPB promotes ovarian cancer progression through regulating aberrant exon skipping of POLA1 and BRCA2. Oncogene. 2023;42:2386–401.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu XX, Yang WX, Pei YC, Luo H, Li XG, Wang YJ, et al. An in vivo CRISPR screen identifies that SNRPC promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2023;83:2000–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dai X, Yu L, Chen X, Zhang J. SNRPD1 confers diagnostic and therapeutic values on breast cancers through cell cycle regulation. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:229.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salib A, Jayatilleke N, Seneviratne JA, Mayoh C, De Preter K, Speleman F, et al. MYCN and SNRPD3 cooperate to maintain a balance of alternative splicing events that drives neuroblastoma progression. Oncogene. 2024;43:363–77.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun L, Liu Y, Guo X, Cui T, Wu C, Tao J, et al. Acetylation-dependent regulation of core spliceosome modulates hepatocellular carcinoma cassette exons and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2024;15:5209.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang C, Li L, Su L, Yang F, Zha Q, Sun M, et al. Intron retention of DDX39A driven by SNRPD2 is a crucial splicing axis for oncogenic MYC/spliceosome program in hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Sci. 2024;11:e2403387.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koedoot E, van Steijn E, Vermeer M, Gonzalez-Prieto R, Vertegaal ACO, Martens JWM, et al. Splicing factors control triple-negative breast cancer cell mitosis through SUN2 interaction and sororin intron retention. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:82.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hu Z, Li M, Chen Y, Chen L, Han Y, Chen C, et al. Disruption of PABPN1 phase separation by SNRPD2 drives colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration through promoting alternative polyadenylation of CTNNBIP1. Sci China Life Sci. 2024;67:1212–25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Li P, Brachtlova T, van der Meulen-Muileman IH, Dekker H, Kumar VS, et al. Evaluation of spliceosome protein SmD2 as a potential target for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:13131.

  23. Tang Z, Kang B, Li C, Chen T, Zhang Z. GEPIA2: an enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W556–60.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldman MJ, Craft B, Hastie M, Repecka K, McDade F, Kamath A, et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:675–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whiteaker JR, Halusa GN, Hoofnagle AN, Sharma V, MacLean B, Yan P, et al. CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays. Nat Methods. 2014;11:703–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nagy A, Munkacsy G, Gyorffy B. Pancancer survival analysis of cancer hallmark genes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6047.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chandrashekar DS, Karthikeyan SK, Korla PK, Patel H, Shovon AR, Athar M, et al. UALCAN: an update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform. Neoplasia. 2022;25:18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:W216–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shen S, Park JW, Lu ZX, Lin L, Henry MD, Wu YN, et al. rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E5593–601.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li Y, Chen Z, Xiao H, Liu Y, Zhao C, Yang N, et al. Targeting the splicing factor SNRPB inhibits endometrial cancer progression by retaining the POLD1 intron. Exp Mol Med. 2025;57:420–35.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Chen Z, Gao Y, Liu Y, Gao Q, Pu Y, et al. SNRPB-mediated regulation of DDX39A splicing promotes ovarian cancer progression by regulating alpha6 integrin subunit expression. Oncogene. 2025;44:2170–85.

  33. Banerjee S, Nagasawa CK, Widen SG, Garcia-Blanco MA. Parsing the roles of DExD-box proteins DDX39A and DDX39B in alternative RNA splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:8534–51.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang H, He C, Guo X, Fang Y, Lai Q, Wang X, et al. DDX39B contributes to the proliferation of colorectal cancer through direct binding to CDK6/CCND1. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:30.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hirano M, Galarza-Munoz G, Nagasawa C, Schott G, Wang L, Antonia AL, et al. The RNA helicase DDX39B activates FOXP3 RNA splicing to control T regulatory cell fate. eLife. 2023;12:e76927.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li Q, Yuan H, Zhao G, Ou D, Zhang J, Li L, et al. DDX39B protects against sorafenib-induced ferroptosis by facilitating the splicing and cytoplasmic export of GPX4 pre-mRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Pharm. 2024;225:116251.

    Google Scholar 

  37. He C, Li A, Lai Q, Ding J, Yan Q, Liu S, et al. The DDX39B/FUT3/TGFbetaR-I axis promotes tumor metastasis and EMT in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:74.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khaket TP, Singh MP, Khan I, Bhardwaj M, Kang SC. Targeting of cathepsin C induces autophagic dysregulation that directs ER stress mediated cellular cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2018;46:92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Jia Y, Wang D. Cathepsin C promotes tumorigenesis in bladder cancer by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Front Biosci. 2024;29:327.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang GP, Yue X, Li SQ. Cathepsin C interacts with TNF-alpha/p38 MAPK signaling pathway to promote proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52:10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xiao Y, Cong M, Li J, He D, Wu Q, Tian P, et al. Cathepsin C promotes breast cancer lung metastasis by modulating neutrophil infiltration and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:423–37 e7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eom T, Zhang C, Wang H, Lay K, Fak J, Noebels JL, et al. NOVA-dependent regulation of cryptic NMD exons controls synaptic protein levels after seizure. Elife. 2013;2:e00178.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nikom D, Zheng S. Alternative splicing in neurodegenerative disease and the promise of RNA therapies. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023;24:457–73.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mehta PR, Brown AL, Ward ME, Fratta P. The era of cryptic exons: implications for ALS-FTD. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18:16.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wilkins OG, Chien M, Wlaschin JJ, Barattucci S, Harley P, Mattedi F, et al. Creation of de novo cryptic splicing for ALS and FTD precision medicine. Science. 2024;386:61–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liao H, Wang S, Wang X, Dai DZ, Zhang Y, Zhu C, et al. Imaging-assisted antisense oligonucleotide delivery for tumor-targeted gene therapy. Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024;2:313–30.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cao M, Yan J, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Jiang G, et al. The potential impact of RNA splicing abnormalities on immune regulation in endometrial cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2025;16:148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the China Health Promotion Foundation. The authors sincerely thank Xinyue Ma and Changjian Qi from our lab for their assistance with paraffin section preparation and the establishment of the PDX model. We thank American Journal Experts (AJE) for English language editing. The authors would also like to express their sincere gratitude to Ms. Qi Qi for her valuable suggestions on language editing.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Yingwei Li, Zhongshao Chen.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Medical Integration and Practice Center, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Birth Defects Prevention and Control, Ji’nan, Shandong Province, China

    Yingwei Li

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Birth Defects Prevention and Control, Ji’nan, Shandong Province, China

    Zhongshao Chen, Yuehan Gao, Yingying Pu, Qianqian Gao, Ning Yang & Peng Li

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, 31 Ji’nan Road, Dongying, Shandong, China

    Yanling Liu

  4. Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji’nan, Shandong Province, China

    Feng Gao

Authors
  1. Yingwei Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongshao Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanling Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuehan Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yingying Pu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qianqian Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Feng Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ning Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: Yingwei Li. Methodology: Yingwei Li. Acquisition of data: Zhongshao Chen, Yanling Liu, and Yuehan Gao. Analysis and interpretation of data: Zhongshao Chen. Technical, or material support: Qianqian Gao, Yingying Pu, Feng Gao, and Ning Yang. Study supervision: Peng Li. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Yingwei Li and Zhongshao Chen. Final approval: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingwei Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University (KYLL-202210-055-1). The animal study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shandong University (25038). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by: Dr Barak Rotblat.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data

Original WB bands

Uncropped bands for the splicing-PCR

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, Y. et al. SNRPD2-mediated regulation of DDX39B splicing promotes endometrial cancer progression by suppressing the activation of CTSC cryptic exons. Cell Death Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08489-4

Download citation

  • Received: 17 July 2025

  • Revised: 18 January 2026

  • Accepted: 10 February 2026

  • Published: 20 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08489-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open access publishing
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Press Releases
  • About the Partner
  • Upcoming Conferences

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Cell Death & Disease (Cell Death Dis)

ISSN 2041-4889 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited