Abstract
Cellulose II exhibits exceptional attributes, including flexibility, high stainability, and gloss. However, its strength is lower than that of cellulose I due to reduced crystallinity during the crystal transition. In this study, we devised a novel method to regulate the proportion and distribution of cellulose I and II crystals. This was achieved by employing a low-concentration alkaline solution and liquid nitrogen, resulting in a high-strength composite material that retained the excellent properties of cellulose II. When cellulose powder was immersed in an 8 wt% NaOH solution and quenched with liquid nitrogen, the crystal transition from cellulose I to II occurred outward from the sample periphery to its center. The percentage of cellulose II increased proportionally with treatment time. This technique was extended to cellulose I-rich cotton fibers, facilitating the creation of a composite fiber with cellulose I at the core and cellulose II on the surface. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composite fiber were greater than those of the mercerized cellulose II fiber. Additionally, the elongation at break and toughness of these fibers surpassed those of conventional cotton fibers. This innovative method allows for the preparation of cellulose I and II composite materials with diverse properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Data availability
The data will be made available upon request.
References
Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3358–93.
Okano T, Sarko A. Merceization of cellulose. II. Alkali-cellulose intermediates and a possible mercerization mechanism. J Appl Polym Sci. 1985;30:325–32.
O’sullvian AC. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose. 1997;4:173–207.
Goswami P, Blackburn RS, Taylor J, White P. Sorption of dyes on cellulose II: effect of alkali treatment of fibre and dye structure. Cellulose. 2011;18:1063–72.
Dinand E, Vignon M, Chanzy H, Heux L. Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of Cellulose I -› Cellulose II. Cellulose. 2002;9:7–18.
Kamide K, Okajima K, Matsui T, Kowsaka K. Study on the solubility of cellulose in aqueous alkali solution by deuteration IR and 13C NMR. Polym J. 1984;16:857–66.
Isogai A, Atalla RH. Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH solutions. Cellulose. 1998;5:309–19.
Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K. All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules. 2004;37:7683–7.
Huber T, Müssig J, Curnow O, Pang S, Bickerton S, Staiger MP. A critical review of all-cellulose composites. J Mater Sci. 2012;47:1171–86.
Li J, Nawaz H, Wu J, Zhang J, Wan J, Mi Q, et al. All-cellulose composites based on the self-reinforced effect. Compos Commun. 2018;9:42–53.
Tanpichai S, Boonmahitthisud A, Soykeabkaew N, Ongthip L. Review of the recent developments in all-cellulose nanocomposites: properties and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;286:119192.
Kugo Y, Nomura S, Isono T, Sato S, Fujiwara M, Satoh T, et al. Elucidating the structural changes of cellulose molecules and dynamics of Na ions during the crystal transition from cellulose I to II in low temperature and low concentration NaOH solution. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;332:121907.
Horikawa Y, Konakahara N, Imai T, Kentaro A, Kobayashi Y, Sugiyama J. The structural changes in crystalline cellulose and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Polym Degrad Stab. 2013;98:2351–6.
Wang H, Li D, Yano H, Abe K. Preparation of tough cellulose II nanofibers with high thermal stability from wood. Cellulose. 2014;21:1505–15.
Sharma S, Nair SS, Zhang Z, Ragauskas AJ, Deng Y. Characterization of micro fibrillation process of cellulose and mercerized cellulose pulp. RSC Adv. 2015;5:63111–22.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Dr. Toshifumi Hiraoki and Mr. Naoya Nakagawa, Instrumental Analysis Support Office, Frontier Chemistry Center, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, for allowing us to conduct the NMR measurements. We would like to express our gratitude to Mr. Shuichiro Seno, Industrial Research Institute, Industrial Technology and Environment Research Department, Hokkaido Research Organization, for cooperation in the tensile tests of the fiber samples. We would like to express our gratitude to Mr. Kenji Okubo, High-voltage Electron Microscope Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, for cooperation in SEM observation. We wish to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yuki Kugo: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing—original draft preparation. Takuya Isono: supervision. Masashi Fujiwara: supervision. Toshifumi Sato: supervision. Hirofumi Tani: supervision. Tomoki Erata: supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing. Kenji Tajima: supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kugo, Y., Isono, T., Fujiwara, M. et al. Optimizing crystal transitions in low-temperature, low-concentration NaOH solutions to prepare cellulose I and II composite materials. Polym J 56, 939–943 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00928-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00928-3
This article is cited by
-
Self-assembly of low-molecular-weight cellulose into nanostructured macroscopic materials
Polymer Journal (2025)