Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Do cardiometabolic risk factors mediate the relationship between body composition and bone mineral content in South Indian children aged 5 to 16 years?

A Correction to this article was published on 12 December 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background/objective

The complex interplay between adiposity, bone health and cardiometabolic risk (CMR) factors is unclear in Indian children. We aimed to investigate the mediating role of number of CMR factors on the relationship between fat % and bone mineral content (BMC) % in South Indian children aged 5–16 years.

Subjects and methods

Healthy children (n = 317), from India, underwent anthropometric, blood biochemistry, blood pressure, along with body composition and BMC assessments using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Based on the number of CMR factors, children were categorised into three groups: 0, 1 and ≥ 2. Analysis of variance was used to compare the parameters between the CMR groups and mediation analysis was performed to examine if the number of CMR factors mediated the relationship between fat % and BMC %.

Results

The prevalence of 0, 1 and ≥ 2 CMR factors was 42.3%, 33.9% and 23.9% respectively; mean BMC % was lowest in ≥ 2 CMR group. In the whole group, BMC % had significant negative correlation with fat % (r = −0.68, p < 0.0001) and positive correlation with lean % (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001). Adjusted for age and sex, results suggested significant mediating effect of number of CMR factors on the relationship between fat % and BMC % (Average Causal Mediation Effects =−0.002, bootstrapped 95% CI: −0.0039, −0.0001, p < 0.01), but losing significance when adjusted for co-variates.

Conclusion

Number of CMR factors mediates the relationship between fat % and BMC % in Indian children. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, understand mechanisms and plan appropriate strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Prevalence of individual risk factors by CMR factors groups stratified by age and sex.
Fig. 2: Comparison of mean BMC % between the CMR factors in whole group of children.
Fig. 3: Directed Acyclical Graph (DAG) depicting the mediating effect of number of CMR factors on the relationship between fat % and BMC % including the potential covariates.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Additional data can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 04 December 2024

    The original online version of this article was revised. In the ‘Statistical Methods’ section, the sentence “Comparison of BMC % between three CMR groups stratified by various ranges of fat %, android fat %, gynoid fat % (<20, 21–30, 31–50 and >40) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) cutoff were performed using ANOVA” was corrected to read “Comparison of BMC % between three CMR groups stratified by various ranges of fat %, android fat %, gynoid fat % (<20, 21–30, 31–40 and >40) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) cutoff were performed using ANOVA.”

  • 12 December 2024

    A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-024-01553-2

References

  1. Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury AK, Sofi NY, Kumar R, Bhadoria AS. Childhood obesity: causes and consequences. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2015;4:187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kansra AR, Lakkunarajah S, Jay MS. Childhood and adolescent obesity: a review. Front Pediatr. 2021;8:866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simmonds M, Llewellyn A, Owen CG, Woolacott N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:95–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noubiap JJ, Nansseu JR, Lontchi-Yimagou E, Nkeck JR, Nyaga UF, Ngouo AT. et al. Global, regional, and country estimates of metabolic syndrome burden in children and adolescents in 2020: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:158–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oza C, Khadilkar V, Karguppikar M, Ladkat D, Gondhalekar K, Shah N, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and predictors of metabolic risk in Indian children, adolescents and youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Endocrine. 2022;75:794–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta A, Sachdeva A, Mahajan N, Gupta A, Sareen N, Pandey RM, et al. Prevalence of pediatric metabolic syndrome and associated risk factors among school-age children of 10–16 years living in District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22:373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India, UNICEF and Population Council. (2019). Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS) National Report. New Delhi.

  8. Sachdev HS, Porwal A, Sarna A, Acharya R, Ramesh S, Kapil U, et al. Intraindividual double-burden of anthropometric undernutrition and “metabolic obesity” in Indian children: a paradox that needs action. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75:1205–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Babhulkar S, Seth S. Prevalence of osteoporosis in India: an observation of 31238 adults. Int J Res Orthop. 2021;7:362–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khinda R, Valecha S, Kumar N, Walia JP, Singh K, Sethi S, et al. Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women of Punjab, India. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2999.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sopher AB, Fennoy I, Oberfield SE. An update on childhood bone health: mineral accrual, assessment, and treatment. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diab Obes 2015;22:35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rizzoli R, Bianchi ML, Garabédian M, McKay HA, Moreno LA. Maximizing bone mineral mass gain during growth for the prevention of fractures in the adolescents and the elderly. Bone. 2010;46:294–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wey HE, Binkley TL, Beare TM, Wey CL, Specker BL. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal associations of lean and fat mass with pQCT bone outcomes in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:106–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollock NK. Childhood obesity, bone development, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;410:52–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Goulding A, Grant AM, Williams SM. Bone and body composition of children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:2090–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kessler J, Koebnick C, Smith N, Adams A. Childhood obesity is associated with increased risk of most lower extremity fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res® 2013;471:1199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heaney RP. Bone mineral content, not bone mineral density, is the correct bone measure for growth studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:350–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koo HC, Lim GP, Kaur S, Chan KQ, Chan KE, Chung C, et al. Bone health and its positive relationships with body composition in Malaysian schoolchildren: findings from a cross-sectional study. Children 2021;8:569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Li H, Zhang Y, Kong Z, Zhang T, Zhang Z. Association of body compositions and bone mineral density in chinese children and adolescents: compositional data analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:1904343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Khadilkar A, Chiplonkar S, Agrawal DP, Sanwalka N, Khadilkar V. Bone health status in Indian overweight/obese children. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:1473–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dimitri P. Fat and bone in children–where are we now? Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018;23:62.

  22. Hetherington-Rauth M, Bea JW, Blew RM, Funk JL, Lee VR, Varadi TC, et al. Effect of cardiometabolic risk factors on the relationship between adiposity and bone mass in girls. Int J Obes. 2018;42:1185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollock NK, Bernard PJ, Gutin B, Davis CL, Zhu H, Dong Y. Adolescent obesity, bone mass, and cardiometabolic risk factors. J Pediatr. 2011;158:727–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 2013.

  25. Soares MJ, Calton EK, Pathak K, Zhao Y. Hypothesized pathways for the association of vitamin D status and insulin sensitivity with resting energy expenditure: a cross sectional mediation analysis in Australian adults of European ancestry. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76:1457–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lakshmi S, Metcalf B, Joglekar C, Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Wilkin TJ. Differences in body composition and metabolic status between white UK and Asian Indian children (EarlyBird 24 and the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study). Pediatr Obes. 2012;7:347–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Angelo S, Yajnik CS, Kumaran K, Joglekar C, Lubree H, Crozier SR, et al. Body size and body composition: a comparison of children in India and the UK through infancy and early childhood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69:1147–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bharathi AV, Kurpad AV, Thomas T, Yusuf S, Saraswathi G, Vaz M. Development of food frequency questionnaires and a nutrient database for the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) pilot study in South India: methodological issues. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17:178–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Swaminathan S, Selvam S, Thomas T, Kurpad AV, Vaz M. Longitudinal trends in physical activity patterns in selected urban south Indian school children. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:174–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual, Human Kinetics Books, 1988.

  31. World Health Organization, BMI-for-age (5–19 years). [cited on July 14, 2022]. Available from, https://www.who.int/tools/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/bmi-for-age.

  32. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series Geneva: WHO; 1995.

  33. Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in humans: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019;73:e35–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuriyan R, Thomas T, Lokesh DP, Sheth NR, Mahendra A, Joy R, et al. Waist circumference and waist for height percentiles in urban South Indian children aged 3–16 years. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:765–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128:S213–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. Nutrition in adolescence. Issues and challenges for the health sector. Discussion paper Geneva: WHO, 2005.

  38. Martin RL, Perez E, He YJ, Dawson R, Millard WJ. Leptin resistance is associated with hypothalamic leptin receptor mRNA and protein downregulation. Metab Clin Exp. 2000;49:1479–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hetherington-Rauth M, Bea JW, Blew RM, Funk JL, Lee VR, Roe DJ, et al. Relationship of cardiometabolic risk biomarkers with DXA and pQCT bone health outcomes in young girls. Bone. 2019;120:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pollock NK, Bernard PJ, Wenger K, Misra S, Gower BA, Allison JD, et al. Lower bone mass in prepubertal overweight children with prediabetes. J Bone Min Res. 2010;2512:2760–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Witkowska-Sędek E, Pyrżak B. Chronic inflammation and the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2020;45:469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuan S, Wan ZH, Cheng SL, Michaëlsson K, Larsson SC. Insulin-like growth factor-1, bone mineral density, and fracture: a Mendelian randomization study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1552–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Misra A, Shrivastava U. Obesity and dyslipidemia in South Asians. Nutrients. 2013;5:2708–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Iyengar SS, Puri R, Narasingan SN. Lipid Association of India expert consensus statement on management of dyslipidemia in Indians 2016-part 1. J Prim Care Spec. 2016;2:134–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Misra A, Wasir JS, Vikram NK. Carbohydrate diets, postprandial hyperlipidaemia, abdominal obesity & Asian Indians: a recipe for atherogenic disaster. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Berg AH, Scherer PE. Adipose tissue, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2005;96:939–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Magni P, Dozio E, Galliera E, Ruscica M, Corsi MM. Molecular aspects of adipokine-bone interactions. Curr Mol Med. 2010;10:522–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Jayakumar Joseph and the entire study team for their involvement in data collection. We are grateful to all the children who participated in the study.

Funding

The study was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAF: data analysis and prepared the different versions of the manuscript. PS: helped in data analysis and contributed to preparing the drafts of the manuscript. SS: performed statistical analysis, interpretation of findings and reviewed the draft. DP: was involved in conducting the research and reviewing the manuscript. JA: was involved in the data collection and reviewed the manuscript. RK: conceptualized, designed and supervised the research, interpretation of results, critically reviewed and edited the draft and has primary responsibility for the final content. Each author had participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility of appropriate portions of the content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Kuriyan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the St John’s Medical College Institutional Ethical committee (reference no.84/2011). Date of approval: Study was approved on 7th July 2011. Informed written consent was obtained from parents and oral assent was obtained from children >10 years of age.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

41430_2024_1494_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Comparison of BMC % between the number of CMR factors stratified by various fat ranges of total fat %, regional fat % distribution and waist-to-height ratio

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farheen, S.A., S, P., Selvam, S. et al. Do cardiometabolic risk factors mediate the relationship between body composition and bone mineral content in South Indian children aged 5 to 16 years?. Eur J Clin Nutr 78, 1014–1021 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-024-01494-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-024-01494-w

Search

Quick links