Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

High-throughput genetic newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy by rapid nucleic acid extraction from dried blood spots and 384-well qPCR

Abstract

Establishing nucleic acid-based assays for genetic newborn screening (NBS) provides the possibility to screen for genetically encoded diseases like spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), best before the onset of symptoms. Such assays should be easily scalable to 384-well reactions that make the screening of up to 2000 samples per day possible. We developed a test procedure based on a cleanup protocol for dried blood spots and a quantitative (q)PCR to screen for a homozygous deletion of exon 7 of the survival of motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1) that is responsible for >95% of SMA patients. Performance of this setup is evaluated in detail and tested on routine samples. Our cleanup method for nucleic acids from dried blood spots yields enough DNA for diverse subsequent qPCR applications. To date, we have applied this approach to test 213,279 samples within 18 months. Thirty patients were identified and confirmed, implying an incidence of 1:7109 for the homozygous deletion. Using our cleanup method, a rapid workflow could be established to prepare nucleic acids from dried blood spot cards. Targeting the exon 7 deletion, no invalid, false-positive, or false-negative results were reported to date. This allows timely identification of the disease and grants access to the recently introduced treatment options, in most cases before the onset of symptoms. Carriers are not identified, thus, there are no concerns of whether to report them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Loeber JG, Kneisser I, Saadallah A, Borrajo GJ, et al. Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39:171–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Costea I. Guiding policy decisions for genetic screening: developing a systematic and transparent approach. Public Health Genom. 2011;14:9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:317–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobrow MJ, Hagens V, Chafe R, Sullivan T, Rabeneck L. Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process. CMAJ 2018;190:E422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Meyer OH, Simonds AK, Schroth MK, Graham RJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: part 2: pulmonary and acute care; medications, supplements and immunizations; other organ systems; and ethics. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28:197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Muntoni F, Wirth B, Montes J, Main M, et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugarman EA, Nagan N, Zhu H, Akmaev VR, Zhou Z, Rohlfs EM, et al. Pan-ethnic carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis for spinal muscular atrophy: clinical laboratory analysis of >72,400 specimens. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verhaart IEC, Robertson A, Leary R, McMacken G, Konig K, Kirschner J, et al. A multi-source approach to determine SMA incidence and research ready population. J Neurol. 2017;264:1465–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldkötter M, Schwarzer V, Wirth R, Wienker TF, Wirth B. Quantitative analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 based on real-time LightCycler PCR: fast and highly reliable carrier testing and prediction of severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:358–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pyatt RE, Prior TW. A feasibility study for the newborn screening of spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Med. 2006;8:428–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefebvre S, Burglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80:155–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wirth B. An update of the mutation spectrum of the survival motor neuron gene (SMN1) in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Hum Mutat. 2000;15:228–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Prior TW, Snyder PJ, Rink BD, Pearl DK, Pyatt RE, Mihal DC, et al. Newborn and carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:1608–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wirth B, Schmidt T, Hahnen E, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Krawczak M, Muller-Myhsok B, et al. De novo rearrangements found in 2% of index patients with spinal muscular atrophy: mutational mechanisms, parental origin, mutation rate, and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:1102–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wirth B, Herz M, Wetter A, Moskau S, Hahnen E, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, et al. Quantitative analysis of survival motor neuron copies: identification of subtle SMN1 mutations in patients with spinal muscular atrophy, genotype-phenotype correlation, and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1340–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolb SJ, Kissel JT. Spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:831–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Vajsar J, Day JW, Montes J, De Vivo DC, et al. Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet. 2016;388:3017–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Messina S. New directions for SMA therapy. J Clin Med. 2018;7:251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alcantara-Ortigoza MA, Belmont-Martinez L, Vela-Amieva M, Gonzalez-Del Angel A. Analysis of the CTNS gene in nephropathic cystinosis Mexican patients: report of four novel mutations and identification of a false positive 57-kb deletion genotype with LDM-2/exon 4 multiplex PCR assay. Genet Test. 2008;12:409–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM, et al. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:625–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saffari A, Kolker S, Hoffmann GF, Weiler M, Ziegler A. Novel challenges in spinal muscular atrophy - How to screen and whom to treat? Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6:197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chien YH, Chiang SC, Weng WC, Lee NC, Lin CJ, Hsieh WS, et al. Presymptomatic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy through newborn screening. J Pediatr. 2017;190:124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strom CM, Anderson B, Peng M, Patel U, Braastad CD, Sun W. 1000 sample comparison of MLPA and RT-PCR for carrier detection and diagnostic testing for spinal muscular atrophy type 1. Open J Genet. 2013;3:111–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arkblad EL, Darin N, Berg K, Kimber E, Brandberg G, Lindberg C, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification improves diagnostics in spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:830–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Forst HT. Problems of multiple tests and evaluations in drug research. Arzneim Forsch. 1985;35:563–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Phan HC, Taylor JL, Hannon H, Howell R. Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: anticipating an imminent need. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39:217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Durner J. Clinical chemistry: challenges for analytical chemistry and the nanosciences from medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:1026–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saavedra-Matiz CA, Isabelle JT, Biski CK, Duva SJ, Sweeney ML, Parker AL, et al. Cost-effective and scalable DNA extraction method from dried blood spots. Clin Chem. 2013;59:1045–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kraszewski JN, Kay DM, Stevens CF, Koval C, Haser B, Ortiz V, et al. Pilot study of population-based newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in New York state. Genet Med. 2018;20:608–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor JL, Lee FK, Yazdanpanah GK, Staropoli JF, Liu M, Carulli JP, et al. Newborn blood spot screening test using multiplexed real-time PCR to simultaneously screen for spinal muscular atrophy and severe combined immunodeficiency. Clin Chem. 2015;61:412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ar Rochmah M, Awano H, Awaya T, Harahap NIF, Morisada N, Bouike Y, et al. Genetic screening of spinal muscular atrophy using a real-time modified COP-PCR technique with dried blood-spot DNA. Brain Dev. 2017;39:851–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao Z, Fu D, Ming Y, Yang J, Huang Q, Lin W, et al. Large scale newborn deafness genetic screening of 142,417 neonates in Wuhan, China. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith M, Calabro V, Chong B, Gardiner N, Cowie S, du Sart D. Population screening and cascade testing for carriers of SMA. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:759–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Calucho M, Bernal S, Alias L, March F, Vencesla A, Rodriguez-Alvarez FJ, et al. Correlation between SMA type and SMN2 copy number revisited: an analysis of 625 unrelated Spanish patients and a compilation of 2834 reported cases. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28:208–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oprea GE, Krober S, McWhorter ML, Rossoll W, Muller S, Krawczak M, et al. Plastin 3 is a protective modifier of autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy. Science. 2008;320:524–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Crooke ST, Witztum JL, Bennett CF, Baker BF. RNA-targeted therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2018;27:714–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Glascock J, Sampson J, Haidet-Phillips A, Connolly A, Darras B, Day J, et al. Treatment algorithm for infants diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy through newborn screening. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5:145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy S, Shell R, Arnold WD, Rodino-Klapac LR, Prior TW, et al. Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1713–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peta Snikeris for proofing the paper.

Funding

Funding

The screening was funded by the German Cystinosis Foundation (Cystinose Stiftung, DSZ-Regional Office Munich, Widenmayerstr. 10, 80538 Munich, Germany). The funders had no influence on the design, interpretation, and publication of these data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludwig Czibere.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czibere, L., Burggraf, S., Fleige, T. et al. High-throughput genetic newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy by rapid nucleic acid extraction from dried blood spots and 384-well qPCR. Eur J Hum Genet 28, 23–30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0476-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0476-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links