Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Speech and language phenotype in Phelan-McDermid (22q13.3) syndrome

A Correction to this article was published on 15 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Communication difficulties are a core feature of Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS). However, a specific speech and language phenotype has not been delineated, preventing prognostic counselling and development of targeted therapies. We examined speech, language, social and functional communication abilities in 21 individuals with PMS (with SHANK3 involvement), using standardised assessments. Mean age was 9.7 years (SD 4.1) and 57% were female. Deletion size ranged from 41 kb to 8.3 Mb. Nine participants (45%) were non-verbal. Four (19%) had greater verbal ability, speaking in at least 4–5 word sentences, but with speech sound errors. Standard scores for receptive and expressive language were low (typically >3 SD below the mean). Language age equivalency was 13–16 months on average (range 2–53 months). There was a significant association between deletion size and the ability to use phrases. Participants with smaller deletion sizes were more likely to be able to use phrases (odds ratio: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14–0.95, p = 0.040). Adaptive behaviour (life skills) was low in all areas (>2 SD below mean). Scores in communication were markedly lower than for daily living (p = 0.008) and socialisation (p < 0.001). A common linguistic profile was characterised by severe impairment across receptive, expressive and social language domains. Yet data indicated greater communicative intent than appeared to be capitalised by current therapies. Early implementation of augmentative (e.g. computer-assisted) modes of communication, alongside promotion of oral language, is essential to harness this intent, accelerate language development and reduce frustration. Future trials should examine the added benefit of targeted speech motor interventions in those with greater verbal capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4: Median deletion size (and interquartile range) in Megabases for the groups who did and did not use phrases.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Phelan K, McDermid HE. The 22q13.3 deletion syndrome (Phelan-McDermid syndrome). Mol Syndromol. 2011;2:186–201.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Phelan MC. Deletion 22q13.3 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durand CM, Betancur C, Boeckers TM, Bockmann J, Chaste P, Fauchereau F, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 are associated with autism spectrum disorders. Nat Genet. 2007;39:25–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boeckers TM, Bockmann J, Kreutz MR, Gundelfinger ED. ProSAP/Shank proteins – a family of higher order organizing molecules of the postsynaptic density with an emerging role in human neurological disease. J Neurochem. 2002;81:903–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolevzon A, Angarita B, Bush L, Wang AT, Frank Y, Yang A, et al. Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a review of the literature and practice parameters for medical assessment and monitoring. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabet A-C, Rolland T, Ducloy M, Lévy J, Buratti J, Mathieu A, et al. A framework to identify modifier genes in patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome. NPJ Genom Med. 2017;2:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-017-0035-2.

  7. Soorya L, Kolevzon A, Zweifach J, Lim T, Dobry Y, Schwartz L. et al. Prospective investigation of autism and genotype-phenotype correlations in 22q13 deletion syndrome and SHANK3 deficiency. Mol Autism. 2013;4:18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zwanenburg RJ, Ruiter SAJ, van den Heuvel ER, Flapper BCT, Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA. Developmental phenotype in Phelan-McDermid (22q13.3 deletion) syndrome: a systematic and prospective study in 34 children. J Neurodev Disord. 2016;8:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Rubeis S, Siper PM, Durkin A, Weissman J, Muratet F, Halpern D. et al. Delineation of the genetic and clinical spectrum of Phelan-McDermid syndrome caused by SHANK3 point mutations. Mol Autism. 2018;9:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning MA, Cassidy SB, Clericuzio C, Cherry AM, Schwartz S, Hudgins L, et al. Terminal 22q deletion syndrome: a newly recognized cause of speech and language disability in the autism spectrum. Pediatrics 2004;114:451–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponson L, Gomot M, Blanc R, Barthelemy C, Roux S, Munnich A. et al. 22q13 deletion syndrome: communication disorder or autism? Evidence from a specific clinical and neurophysiological phenotype. Translational Psychiatry. 2018;8:146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffries AR, Curran S, Elmslie F, Sharma A, Wenger S, Hummel M, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of ring chromosome 22. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2005;137A:139–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koolen DA, Reardon W, Rosser EM, Lacombe D, Hurst JA, Law CJ, et al. Molecular characterisation of patients with subtelomeric 22q abnormalities using chromosome specific array-based comparative genomic hybridisation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:1019–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reierson G, Bernstein J, Froehlich-Santino W, Urban A, Purmann C, Berquist S, et al. Characterizing regression in Phelan McDermid Syndrome (22q13 deletion syndrome). J Psychiatr Res. 2017;91:139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oberman LM, Boccuto L, Cascio L, Sarasua S, Kaufmann WE. Autism spectrum disorder in Phelan-McDermid syndrome: initial characterization and genotype-phenotype correlations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarasua SM, Dwivedi A, Boccuto L, Chen C-F, Sharp JL, Rollins JD, et al. 22q13.2q13.32 genomic regions associated with severity of speech delay, developmental delay, and physical features in Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Genet Med. 2014;16:318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mei C, Fedorenko E, Amor DJ, Boys A, Hoeflin C, Carew P, et al. Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:676–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan AT, Haaften LV, van Hulst K, Edley C, Mei C, Tan TY, et al. Early speech development in Koolen de Vries syndrome limited by oral praxis and hypotonia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:75–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dykens EM. Measuring behavioral phenotypes: provocations from the “new genetics”. Am J Ment Retard. 1995;99:522–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. St John M, Ponchard C, van Reyk O, Mei C, Pigdon L, Amor DJ, et al. Speech and language in children with Klinefelter syndrome. J Commun Disord. 2019;78:84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brignell A, St John M, Boys A, Bruce A, Dinale C, Pigdon L, et al. Characterization of speech and language phenotype in children with NRXN1 deletions. Am J Med Genet Part B. 2018;177:700–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutter M, Le Couteur A, Lord C. Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 2003.

  23. StataCorp L. Stata statistical software: release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2017.

  24. Ziats CA, Jain L, McLarney B, Vandenboom E, DuPont BR, Rogers C, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 2 in Phelan-McDermid syndrome: institutional experience and review of the literature. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:104042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Webster KT, Raymond GV. 22q13 Deletion syndrome: a report of the language function in two cases. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2004;12:41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nesslinger NJ, Gorski JL, Kurczynski TW, Shapira SK, Siegel-Bartelt J, Dumanski JP, et al. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characterization of seven patients with deletions of chromosome 22q13.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:464–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarasua SM, Dwivedi A, Boccuto L, Rollins JD, Chen C-F, Rogers RC, et al. Association between deletion size and important phenotypes expands the genomic region of interest in Phelan–McDermid syndrome (22q13 deletion syndrome). J Med Genet. 2011;48:761–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liao S-F, Liu J-C, Hsu C-L, Chang M-Y, Chang T-M, Cheng H. Cognitive development in children with language impairment, and correlation between language and intelligence development in kindergarten children with developmental delay. J Child Neurol. 2014;30:42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Norrelgen F, Fernell E, Eriksson M, Hedvall A, Persson C, Sjolin M, et al. Children with autism spectrum disorders who do not develop phrase speech in the preschool years. Autism. 2015;19:934–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Levy SE, Giarelli E, Lee L-C, Schieve LA, Kirby RS, Cunniff C, et al. Autism spectrum disorder and co-occurring developmental, psychiatric, and medical conditions among children in multiple populations of the United States. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010;31:267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moss J, Howlin P, Oliver C. The assessment and presentation of autism spectrum disorder and associated characteristics in individuals with severe intellectual disability and genetic syndromes. The Oxford handbook of intellectual disability and development. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 275–302.

  32. Moss J, Howlin P. Autism spectrum disorders in genetic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, intervention and understanding the wider autism spectrum disorder population. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53:852–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C. The social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 2003.

  34. Morgan AT, Masterton R, Pigdon L, Connelly A, Liegeois FJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of chronic dysarthric speech after childhood brain injury: reliance on a left-hemisphere compensatory network. Brain. 2013;136:646–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Morgan AT, Su M, Reilly S, Conti-Ramsden G, Connelly A, Liégeois FJ. A brain marker for developmental speech disorders. J Pediatr. 2018;198:234–9.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liégeois F, Tournier J-D, Pigdon L, Connelly A, Morgan AT. Corticobulbar tract changes as predictors of dysarthria in childhood brain injury. Neurology. 2013;80:926–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liégeois FJ, Turner SJ, Mayes A, Bonthrone AF, Boys A, Smith L, et al. Dorsal language stream anomalies in an inherited speech disorder. Brain. 2019;142:966–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kasari C, Kaiser A, Goods K, Nietfeld J, Mathy P, Landa R, et al. Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr. 2014;53:635–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service; 2005.

  40. Zimmerman IL, Steinger VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scales. 5th ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2011.

  41. Dunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody picture vocabulary test. 4th ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2007.

  42. Wetherby AM, Prizant BM. Communication and symbolic behavior scales developmental profile. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2002.

  43. Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, Mensah F, Pennington L, Morgan A. Language outcomes of children with cerebral palsy aged 5 years and 6 years: A population‐based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:605–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dodd B, Zhu H, Crosbie S, Holm A, Ozanne A. Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London, England: Psychological Corporation; 2002.

  45. Robbins J, Klee T. Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. J Speech Hearing Disord. 1987;52:271–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sigafoos J, Woodyatt G, Keen D, Tait K, Tucker M, Roberts-Pennell D, et al. Identifying potential communicative acts in children with developmental and physical disabilities. Commun Disord Q. 2000;21:77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the individuals with PMS and their families for their participation. We also thank Megan Toole for her assistance with recruitment through the Phelan McDermid Syndrome Foundation of Australia.

Funding

Funding was provided by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship #1105008 (A.M.); NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Speech and Language Neurobiology #1116976 awarded to A.M., D.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela T. Morgan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a typo

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brignell, A., Gu, C., Holm, A. et al. Speech and language phenotype in Phelan-McDermid (22q13.3) syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 29, 564–574 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00761-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00761-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links