Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The novel duplication HRAS c.186_206dup p.(Glu62_Arg68dup): clinical and functional aspects

Abstract

Specific activating missense HRAS variants cause Costello syndrome (CS), a RASopathy with recognizable facial features. The majority of these dominant disease causing variants affect the glycine residues in position 12 or 13. A clinically suspected CS diagnosis can be confirmed through identification of a dominant pathogenic HRAS variant. A novel HRAS variant predicting p.(Glu62_Arg68dup) was identified in an individual with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Chiari 1 malformation and ectodermal findings consistent with a RASopathy. Functional studies showed that the p.Glu62_Arg68dup alteration affects HRAS interaction with effector protein PIK3CA (catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase) and the regulator neurofibromin 1 (NF1) GTPase-activating protein (GAP). HRASGlu62_Arg68dup binding with effectors rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF1), RAL guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (RALGDS) and phospholipase C1 (PLCE1) was enhanced. Accordingly, p.Glu62_Arg68dup increased steady-state phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 downstream of RAF1, whereas AKT phosphorylation downstream of PI3K was not significantly affected. Growth factor stimulation revealed that expression of HRASGlu62_Arg68dup abolished the HRAS’ capacity to modulate downstream signaling. Our data underscore that different qualities of dysregulated HRAS-dependent signaling dynamics determine the clinical severity in CS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Phenotypic findings.
Fig. 2: Consequences of HRAS p.Glu62_Arg68dup on effector and regulator binding.
Fig. 3: Consequences of HRAS p.Glu62_Arg68dup on signal transduction.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gripp KW, Morse LA, Axelrad M, Chatfield KC, Chidekel A, Dobyns W, et al. Costello syndrome: clinical phenotype, genotype and management guidelines. Am J Med Genet. 2019;179:1725–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant AR, Cushman BJ, Cavé H, Dillon MW, Gelb BD, Gripp KW, et al. Assessing the gene-disease association of 19 genes with the RASopathies using the ClinGen gene curation framework. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1485–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sol-Church K, Gripp KW The molecular basis of Costello syndrome. In: Zenker M (editor) Noonan syndrome and related disorders—a matter of deregulated Ras signaling. Monographs in human genetics, vol 17, Basel: Karger; 2009. p. 94–103

  4. Xu F, Wang HJ, Lin ZM, Yu B. Recurrent duplication mutation in HRAS causing mild Costello syndrome in a Chinese patient. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40:404–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.12571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz S, Lissewski C, Simsek-Kiper PO, Alanay Y, Boduroglu K, Zenker M, et al. Functional analysis of a duplication (p.E63_D69dup) in the switch II region of HRAS: new aspects of the molecular pathogenesis underlying Costello syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:1643–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gremer L, De Luca A, Merbitz-Zahradnik T, Dallapiccola B, Morlot S, Tartaglia M, et al. Duplication of Glu37 in the switch I region of HRAS impairs effector/GAP binding and underlies Costello syndrome by promoting enhanced growth factor-dependent MAPK and AKT activation. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:790–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gripp KW, Bifeld E, Stabley DL, Hopkins E, Meien S, Vinette K, et al. A novel HRAS substitution (c.266C>G; p.S89C) resulting in decreased downstream signaling suggests a new dimension of RAS pathway dysregulation in human development. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:2106–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurovich Y, Hanani Y, Bar O, Nadav G, Fleischer N, Gelbman D, et al. Identifying facial phenotypes of genetic disorders using deep learning. Nat Med. 2019;25:60–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheffzek K, Ahmadian MR, Kabsch W, Wiesmuller L, Lautwein A, Schmitz F, et al. The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. Science. 1997;277:333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boriack-Sjodin PA, Margarit SM, Bar-Sagi D, Kuriyan J. The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos. Nature. 1998;394:337–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vetter IR, Wittinghofer A. The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. Science. 2001;294:1299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gripp KW, Kolbe V, Brandenstein LI, Rosenberger G. Attenuated phenotype of Costello syndrome and early death in a patient with an HRAS mutation (c.179G>T; p.Gly60Val) affecting signalling dynamics. Clin Genet. 2017;92:332–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmadian MR, Kiel C, Stege P, Scheffzek K. Structural fingerprints of the Ras-GTPase activating proteins neurofibromin and p120GAP. J Mol Biol. 2003;329:699–710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pacold ME, Suire S, Perisic O, Lara-Gonzalez S, Davis CT, Walker EH, et al. Crystal structure and functional analysis of Ras binding to its effector phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma. Cell. 2000;103:931–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Walker EH, Perisic O, Ried C, Stephens L, Williams RL. Structural insights into phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalysis and signalling. Nature. 1999;402:313–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moodie SA, Paris M, Villafranca E, Kirshmeier P, Willumsen BM, Wolfman A. Different structural requirements within the switch II region of the Ras protein for interactions with specific downstream targets. Oncogene. 1995;11:447–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bunney TD, Harris R, Gandarillas NL, Josephs MB, Roe SM, Sorli SC, et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into ras association domains of phospholipase C epsilon. Mol Cell. 2006;21:495–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gripp KW, Sol-Church K, Smpokou P, Graham GE, Stevenson DA, Hanson H, et al. An attenuated phenotype of Costello syndrome in three unrelated individuals with a HRAS c.179G>A (p.Gly60Asp) mutation correlates with uncommon functional consequences. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A:2085–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the family for allowing us to share this information.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Bundesministerium fĂĽr Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, GeNeRARe, TP6 to GR, funding code 01GM1902E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen W. Gripp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

KWG is the CMO for FDNA, the company providing the Face2Gene application.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gripp, K.W., Baker, L., Robbins, K.M. et al. The novel duplication HRAS c.186_206dup p.(Glu62_Arg68dup): clinical and functional aspects. Eur J Hum Genet 28, 1548–1554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0662-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0662-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links