Table 3 Content of included papers pertaining to the key concepts from the analysis.

From: Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research

Authors (year)

Uncertainty and identity

Emotional response

Behavioural response

Cognitive response

Medicine and the role of professionals

Individual differences, communication and information needs

Timmermans and Buchbinder (2010) [24]

“Patients in waiting”; “illness identity”; “A liminal state between pathology and normalcy”; “Living between health and disease”; “not sick, but not normal”

Shock; “a roller coaster ride”

“Precautions”; “actions that prove the social relevancy of [the condition]”; “preventative practices” as “measures to offset the ‘real’ disease”

 

“Shared patient role”; “contradictory messaging”; “Interactional dilemma”; “[irrelevance of] the usual diagnostic roadmaps”; diagnostic uncertainty “marshalled”

“A number of families in our study that were exceptions to [the] general rule [of how they understood the result and wished to be managed] [Perhaps due to] structural and cultural factors”

Timmermans and Buchbinder (2012) [25]

How similar to symptomatic infants? Treat as such?

 

Vigilance; preventative measures; “overreacting”

NBS programme not undermined

“Changed disease ontology”; “collectively negotiating the parameters of the anomaly”; “knowledge in the making”; “bridging work”

Parents’ internet use and inaccurate/ outdated information

DeLuca et al. (2011) [26]

“Living with a potential illness”; not a “normal life”; “something could happen”

“As if a death occurred”; “consumed by thoughts of the disorder”

Monitoring for symptoms

“Unshakable faith in the merits of newborn screening”

HCPs provide reassurance but some professionals also felt to have inadequate knowledge; importnace of personal approach

Impact of socioeconomic background; inadequate NBS knowledge; internet searching; persisting inaccuracies

Tluczek et al. (2010) [27]

Uncertainty and ambiguity; Abnormal result/ healthy child; “always going to be this cloud hanging over”

“Initial psychological plummet”; only “worrisome content” is heard; “Frightening emotional roller coaster”; “potential loss of infant”; “emotional suffering”; “always in the back of our mind”

“Action-oriented coping”; “mobilising”; “hyper-vigilance”; “precautionary health measures”

“A roller coaster ride of trying to figure out what it all meant”

“[Professionals] help reframe the situation”; “Structure Providers” [HCPs shape interpretations]

“The Opportunity–Danger Continuum”; gender differences; impact of “cognitive resources”; “Structure Providers” [social contacts/ media shape interpretations]; Need for “facts and figures”; Need new label that does not connote the ‘true’ disease

Hayeems et al. (2017) [28]

“Uncertainty about what an inconclusive diagnosis means”; Diagnosis v. “perfect” looking child; Fear of “potential labelling effects”

“Cascade of effects”

“Active symptom seeking”; monitoring; lifestyle changes

“Unsettled meaning”; struggle to make sense; “interested in how it all worked”; “value placed on knowledge unto itself, for most”;

“Mixed messages”; “Mixed feelings about surveillance”

 

Sadat et al. (2020) [29]

“Uncertainty”

Anxiety; helplessness; fear of child’s death; concern about future

Continuation of unnecessary treatment

Appreciation of enhanced health awareness; stress caused by the NBS result “not justified”

Mixed feelings about ongoing monitoring/ treatment

 

Johnson et al. (2019) [31]

“Liminality and Uncertainty”; “typical child” v. genetic designation; “don’t know what’s round the corner”; “there is that chance [of symptoms developing]”

Trauma; “Fear, Grief, and Threat to Child’s Life”; “bombshell”; extended issues; continued threat

“Prophylactic medical regimens”; “need to hyper-control the environment”; child’s health as “battle”; “all this prevention”

“Making certainty out of uncertainty”; “Utility of Labelling”; value of knowledge

“Challenging traditional ideas about health and illness”; “Incongruence with the Traditional Medical Model”; “moving the goalposts” [mixed messages]; “Intrusion & control”

“Information Sufficiency”; personal context; “Tension of Idiosyncratic Forms of Certainty”

Kerruish (2011) [32]

“Between planning for adversity and hoping for the best”; anticipation of potential medical complications/short life

“Generally mild” initially; “fluctuating recurrence of worries”; “subtle, complex, dynamic and ongoing reactions”

“Behavioural modification”; monitoring; “specific practical changes”; “preparing themselves for a disease that may never eventuate”

“Process of sense-making”; “conscious process of minimisation”; “comparison strategy” to make sense of risk; “Lucky to know”

 

“Varied” emotional responses between parent/ intra-individually/ over time; interaction of personal and contextual factors and uncertainty; "gist" of information

Tluczek et al. (2019) [30]

Envisioning a “normal” future; hope for “normal” life v. awareness of special health needs

Worry about future

“Protective behaviours”

Comparing child’s health to ‘a typical CF patient’

 

Complex interrelated factors influence parent perceptions of vulnerability; effect of depression and anxiety