Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Dental implants

Short-term patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical parameters in guided bone regeneration

Abstract

Design

The prospective observational study aimed to record the short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) like pain, swelling, difficulty in mouth opening, and oral health quality of life (oral health impact profile-14), following a single-site tooth extraction and guided bone regeneration(GBR) using resorbable membrane and bone allograft. Correlation of PROMs with clinical/intra-surgical parameters like flap advancement, gingival and mucosal thickness, surgery duration, and wound opening were observed. PROMs and clinical parameters were assessed pre-operatively and on days 2,4,7 and 14 during the postoperative two weeks.

Cohort selection

Systemically healthy, non-smoker twenty-seven patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the dentate site with immediate post-extraction buccal dehiscence ≥4 mm were recruited. Only one tooth site from each patient was included in the study.

Data analysis

The severity of pain, swelling, and difficulty in mouth opening were reported as zero, mild (1–3), moderate(4–6), and severe(7–10) using visual analog scores(VAS). The number of patients experiencing symptoms was presented as a percentage. Mean, standard error, median values, and IQR are reported for all OHIP-14 domains at various time points. Spearmen’s coefficient was used to correlate four PROMs for overall values for each time point separately and to correlate with clinical parameters. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

VAS for all PROMs peaked on post-surgical day 2 and improved until day 14. Most patients experienced no or mild symptoms during postoperative two weeks, with moderate to severe responses reported by 41–56% of patients on day 2. All PROMs correlated significantly with each other, with a strong correlation between VAS for pain and swelling. In the context of post-surgical oral health quality of life (OHIP-14), patients reported physical pain as the most experienced outcome, followed by psychological discomfort at all time points. All three PROMs pain, swelling, and difficulty of mouth opening positively correlated with all domains of OHIP-14, with the strongest correlation between the physical pain domain with VAS pain(day 7) and VAS swelling(day 2). Measured gingival thickness, mucosal thickness, flap advancement, and duration of surgery were 0.42 ± 0.04 mm, 0.2 ± 0.02 mm,6.8 ± 0.5 mm, and 123 ± 6 min, respectively. All clinical parameters and pre-operative PROMs correlated with post-operative PROMs. Wound opening was maximum on day 7 with an average extent of 3.3 mm and prevalence in 81.5%patients. Wound opening and duration of surgery were highly correlated with pain and flap advancement with difficulty of mouth opening on 7 th day. OHIP-14 was strongly associated with gingival thickness and wound healing on days 2 and 7, respectively.

Conclusion

Short-term postoperative patient-reported outcomes are most severe on the second-day post-GBR. Clinical parameters like soft tissue thickness, flap advancement, and wound opening duration of surgery impact the PROMs like pain, swelling, and difficulty in mouth opening and thus influence the postoperative quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Sanz-Sánchez I, Ortiz-Vigón A, Sanz-Martín I, Figuero E, Sanz M. Effectiveness of lateral bone augmentation on the alveolar crest dimension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:128S–42S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demetter RS, Calahan BG, Mealey BL. Histologic evaluation of wound healing after ridge preservation with cortical, cancellous, and combined cortico-cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2017;88:860–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinaia BM, Kazerani S, Korkis S, Masabni OM, Shah M, Neely AL. Effect of guided bone regeneration on immediately placed implants: Meta-analyses with at least 12 months follow-up after functional loading. J Periodontol. 2021;92:1749–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao J, Lee KK, McGrath C, Wu YN, Li KY, Mattheos N. Comparison of patient-centered outcomes after routine implant placement, teeth extraction, and periodontal surgical procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:373–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Khabbaz AK, Griffin TJ, Al-Shammari KF. Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants. J Periodontol. 2007;78:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Urban T, Wenzel A. Discomfort experienced after immediate implant placement associated with three different regenerative techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kofina V, Monfaredzadeh M, Rawal SY, Dentino AR, Singh M, Tatakis DN. Patient-reported outcomes following guided bone regeneration: Correlation with clinical parameters. J Dent. 2023;136:104605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun G, Cao L, Li H. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin combined with guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of peri-implantitis bone defect. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:8397–402.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mai T, Tong Y, Jiang F. Investigation and analysis of pain after dental implantation and its influencing factors. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:12065–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anika Dawar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawar, A., Yadav, V.S., Nanda, A. et al. Short-term patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical parameters in guided bone regeneration. Evid Based Dent 26, 32–33 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01115-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01115-w

Search

Quick links