Table 2 Ethical considerations for selecting among eligible patients in high-demand gene therapy (GT) trials.

From: Ethical challenges for a new generation of early-phase pediatric gene therapy trials

Ethical consideration

Potential implementation

Illustrative example(s)

Enhance scientific and social value

Increase representativeness to improve generalizability

• Prioritize eligible patients whose inclusion would improve the representation of relevant genotypes (e.g., variants) or other characteristics (e.g., sex, race, age, comorbidities)

 

Increase knowledge about clinically relevant subgroups

• Prioritize—and potentially overrepresent—eligible patients with clinically relevant genotypes (e.g., variants) or other characteristics (e.g., sex, race, age, comorbidities)

• Prioritize—and potentially overrepresent—eligible patients in whom the potential effects of the GT are more likely to be observable

Enhance risk–benefit profile for individual participants

Enhance potential benefits

• For neurodegenerative or similar diseases, prioritize eligible patients with earlier-stage disease if GT has the potential to halt disease progression, but not to restore affected tissues

 

Reduce risks

• Prioritize eligible patients expected to better tolerate side effects or complications of GT

• Prioritize eligible patients with advanced disease who would lose less quality of life or fewer life-years from adverse events

• Prioritize eligible patients with reliable local health care and ability to maintain follow-up for GT safety

Promote justice

Provide equal chances

• Give all eligible participants an equal chance of participating in the trial

 

Promote equal access

• Ensure that eligible patients with unreliable local health-care access (e.g., because of country of residence or lack of health-care insurance) receive an equal opportunity to participate

 

Prioritize disadvantaged groups

• Prioritize eligible patients with the most limited treatment or research options

• Prioritize eligible patients from otherwise disadvantaged groups

 

Promote reciprocity

• Prioritize eligible patients who participated in preparatory research for the GT trial (e.g., natural history study)

  1. Participant selection approaches generally optimize one or two of these considerations and may involve tradeoffs with others (e.g., promoting equal opportunity to enroll may conflict with reducing risks to participants). Different implementations of the same consideration (e.g., enhance potential benefits and reduce risks) may also conflict. The preferred approach will depend on the specifics of the trial and may affect a trial’s number of participants, location(s), cost, and other features. This framework builds on a previous analysis of high-demand trials [51].