Table 1 Diversity statistics across sampling locations and average over all locations

From: Demographic history influences spatial patterns of genetic diversityin recently expanded coyote (Canis latrans) populations

 

Location

n

A

AR

HO

HE

FIS

North

New York (NY)

5

4.9

4.47

0.78

0.809

0.040

 

Pennsylvania (PA)

163

13.8

4.89

0.821

0.833

−0.096

 

Ohio (OH)

85

13.2

5.08

0.839

0.848

−0.075

 

Maryland (MD)

7

6.3

4.78

0.838

0.819

−0.079

 

Virginia (VA)

18

9.3

5.15

0.827

0.856

−0.093

 

North Carolina (NC)

19

10.2

5.16

0.864

0.852

−0.053

 

OVERALL NORTH

297

9.62

4.92

0.828

0.836

 

South

South Carolina (SC)

10

7.5

4.98

0.849

0.846

−0.014

 

Georgia (GA)

22

10.2

5.09

0.830

0.830

−0.025

 

Alabama (AL)

15

9.2

5.09

0.854

0.834

−0.055

 

Louisiana (LA)

5

5.2

4.70

0.86

0.838

−0.050

 

Florida (FL)

133

13.4

5.09

0.854

0.849

−0.045

 

OVERALL SOUTH

185

9.10

4.99

0.849

0.839

 
  1. State abbreviations given in in parentheses. (n sample size, A average number of alleles per locus, A R allelic richness, H O observed heterozygosity, H E expected heterozygosity, F IS inbreeding coefficient)