Table 2 Population statistics of Caribbean and Mexican Magnolias

From: Genetic patterns in Neotropical Magnolias (Magnoliaceae) using de novo developed microsatellite markers

Tax.

Pop.

NS

SpE

Max

APD

M

 

P

 

NG

 

A

 

Ho

 

He

 

Fis

 
      

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

ACU

TOP

20

3.78

1.8

1.44

31

10

69.565

90

19.871

20

5.452

5.9

0.594

0.610

0.591

0.647

0.021

0.083

CUB

PIC

20

5.32

3.9

1.85

30

10

70.455

100

19.967

20

5.833

6.6

0.597

0.625

0.613

0.674

0.052

0.098

DOD

MART

20

17.92

10.2

8.62

21

–

65.517

–

19.857

–

6.714

–

0.451

–

0.528

–

0.170*

–

DOD

GUA

20

26.08

10.4

12.39

21

–

68.966

–

19.905

–

7.238

–

0.515

–

0.573

–

0.127*

–

DOM

BAR

20

0.16

0.05

0.06

19

10

62.500

100

19.947

20

4.263

5.4

0.625

0.750

0.573

0.673

–0.065

–0.089

DOM

ROD

20

0.28

0.09

0.10

19

10

62.500

100

20.000

20

3.368

3.8

0.503

0.600

0.482

0.577

–0.018

–0.014

EKM

GRA

20

1.02

0.28

0.47

28

10

57.447

100

20.000

20

4.536

4.3

0.482

0.520

0.464

0.496

–0.013

–0.024

EKM

MAN

20

1.52

0.88

0.40

28

10

59.574

80

19.929

19.9

3.786

3.4

0.475

0.465

0.458

0.449

–0.012

–0.01

HAM

COR

20

0.98

0.79

0.15

22

10

60.000

90

20.000

20

6.682

6.2

0.723

0.650

0.712

0.668

0.011

0.053

HAM

CAC

20

1.70

0.60

0.71

22

10

60.000

90

20.000

20

6.591

6.5

0.707

0.635

0.704

0.661

0.021

0.064

LAC

LAC

20

–

–

–

20

–

64.706

–

20.000

–

4.500

–

0.638

–

0.603

–

–0.032

–

LAC

YAJ

20

0,23

0.81

0.10

20

–

67.647

–

20.000

–

4.750

–

0.688

–

0.592

–

–0.135

–

PAL

SAL

20

0.62

0.19

0.20

18

10

59.375

100

20.000

20

4.611

5.5

0.514

0.625

0.511

0.638

0.021

0.046

PAL

MON

20

0.16

0.05

0.05

18

10

59.375

100

20.000

20

4.278

5.2

0.464

0.580

0.483

0.594

0.066

0.049

POR

TOR

20

10.45

6.1

3.43

28

10

70.000

100

20.000

20

6.286

6.4

0.525

0.510

0.607

0.625

0.160*

0.209*

POR

MARI

20

1.95

1.4

0.90

28

10

67.500

90

19.964

20

5.357

6.0

0.566

0.645

0.564

0.622

0.022

–0.011

SPL

YUN

20

8.08

3.7

3.31

23

10

69.444

100

19.957

20

5.391

6.2

0.580

0.630

0.602

0.662

0.063

0.073

  1. Tax.: abbreviations of (sub)species according to Table 1. Pop.: population abbreviations according to Table 1. NS: number of sampled individuals. SpE: Spatial Extent (in km): the greatest pairwise distance in the population. Max: Maximum distance (in km) between two consecutive individuals of a population (i.e. with no other (recorded) individual(s) in between). APD: Average Pairwise Distance between individuals (in km). M: number of microsatellite markers employed. T: taxon-datasets, which include all the markers out of the 63 published microsatellite markers that were polymorphic and unambiguous to score for the species at hand (Supplementary Table S2: A), omitting the markers with high probability of containing null alleles (Supplementary Table S4). S: The Splendentes-normalized dataset (dataset 3) which contain ten microsatellite markers that could be genotyped for all the 8 taxa of the section Talauma subsection Splendentes (Figlar and Nooteboom 2004) present in this study (See Supplementary Table S2: all the microsatellite markers indicated with an asterisk). P: percentage of polymorphic loci (%). NG: average number of genotyped individuals. A: average number of alleles. Ho: average observed heterozygosity. He: average expected heterozygosity. FIS: population inbreeding coefficient, significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions are indicated with * (p = 0.05)
Back to article page