Table 3 Number of STRUCTURE clusters of Magnolias from the Caribbean and Mexico

From: Genetic patterns in Neotropical Magnolias (Magnoliaceae) using de novo developed microsatellite markers

 

D1

D2

D3

DR(i)

DR(c)

PR(i)

PR(c)

   

ΔK

2

2

3

3

3

2

2

   

Mean LnK

9

10

8

7

4

3

3

   

S5

A

B

C

D1

D2

E1

E2

   
 

CU

DOD

DOM

EKM

HAM

LAC

PAL

POR

SPL

 

ΔK

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

7

 

Mean LnK

2

2

3

2

1

2

2

5

1

 

S5

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

 
 

TOP

PIC

GUA

MART

BAR

ROD

GRA

MAN

CAC

COR

ΔK

2

2

2

2

3

5

2

6

5

2

Mean LnK

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

S5

O1

O2

P1

P2

Q1

Q2

R1

R2

S1

S2

 

LAC

YAJ

SAL

MON

MARI

TOR

YUN

   

ΔK

7

7

5

8

3

3

7

   

Mean LnK

1

1

1

1

1

3

1

   

S5

T1

T2

U1

U2

V1

V2

N

   
  1. D1 = dataset 1 which comprises 340 individuals representing 17 populations, genotyped for all 63 microsatellite markers where possible, including the assumed monomorphic data (See Supplementary Table S2: categories A, B and C). D2 = dataset 2 which comprises 340 individuals representing 17 populations, genotyped for all 63 microsatellite markers where possible, excluding the assumed monomorphic data (See Supplementary Table S2: categories A and B). D3 = dataset 3 which comprises 260 individuals representing 13 populations of the 8 taxa of the section Talauma subsection Splendentes (See Table 1: Class. = TAS), genotyped for 10 microsatellite markers (See Supplementary Table S2: marker names indicated with an asterisk). DR: DR-dataset comprising the 120 individuals comprising 6 populations and 3 species of the Dominican Republic for all the markers of which data was generated (See Supplementary Table S2: categories A, B and C in the columns DOM, HAM and PAL). PR: PR-dataset comprising comprising 60 individuals representing three populations and two species of Puerto Rico for all the markers of which data was generated (See Supplementary Table S2: categories A, B and C in the columns POR and SPL). The DR- and PR-dataset were run with the independent allele model (i) and the correlated allele model (c). Abbreviations of species and populations are according to Table 1; CU: Magnolia cubensis. ΔK according to Evanno et al. (2005). Mean LnK = Mean maximum likelihood. S5: the corresponding plots in Supplementary Figure S5
Back to article page