Table 2 Comparison of the alternative demographic models for each district combination using the ΔAIC values.
Model | Pa | M1s2m2tb | M4s4m2tb | M4s8m2tb | M4s8m3tb | M6s4m2tb | M6s8m2tb | M6s8m3tb | S1s2m3tc | S6s4m3tc | S6s8m3tc | S6s8m4tc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tohoku–Chubu | 36.6 | 25.9 | 0 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 0.3 | 8 | 9.7 | 27.2 | 9.4 | 12.6 | 15.4 |
Tohoku–Chugoku | 61 | 53.5 | 5.3 | 7.5 | 11 | 0 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 59.1 | 14.8 | 16.8 | 21 |
Tohoku–Okinawa | 171 | 134.1 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 7.2 | 0 | 8.1 | 9.9 | 138.1 | 24.8 | 11.5 | 15.6 |
Chubu–Chugoku | 27.9 | 15.9 | 4.3 | 13.3 | 17.5 | 3.3 | 10.7 | 0 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 15.5 | 21.5 |
Chubu–Okinawa | 87 | 56.6 | 2.7 | 4 | 2.9 | 0 | 2.8 | 4 | 59.8 | 15.6 | 8.5 | 10.4 |
Chugoku–Okinawa | 89 | 77.8 | 16.9 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 0 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 83.5 | 27.4 | 19.4 | 13.5 |
