Fig. 4: Phenotypic variance in weight, femur–SVL ratio, and time to metamorphosis appears driven by natural selection from ecological forces rather than isolation by distance when wood frogs are reared at low-density but not high-density, whereas variation in larval growth rate appears conserved across populations. | Heredity

Fig. 4: Phenotypic variance in weight, femur–SVL ratio, and time to metamorphosis appears driven by natural selection from ecological forces rather than isolation by distance when wood frogs are reared at low-density but not high-density, whereas variation in larval growth rate appears conserved across populations.

From: Ecological adaptation drives wood frog population divergence in life history traits

Fig. 4

Points are pairwise QST–FST values, calculated using fitted partial regression means adjusted for covariance in average temperature, and lines represent linear regressions, compared at low-density (filled points, solid lines) and high-density (open points, dashed lines). Red horizontal lines indicate at or below which phenotypic variance is not due to natural selection (QST = FST).

Back to article page