Fig. 5: Schematic representation of the likelihood of the models tested with fastsimcoal2. | Heredity

Fig. 5: Schematic representation of the likelihood of the models tested with fastsimcoal2.

From: Genomic data and multi-species demographic modelling uncover past hybridization between currently allopatric freshwater species

Fig. 5

The name given to each model is indicated above the schematic representation, as well the difference to maximum likelihood (dif. to max. likelihood), which is the difference in log10 units between the estimated likelihood and the maximum likelihood if there was a perfect fit to the observed site frequency spectrum. The closer to zero (less negative values), the better the fit. The estimated admixture proportion is the parameter α. Models AC have eight parameters and therefore are directly comparable. Models DF have nine parameters and are also directly comparable. All inferred parameters are indicated in relation to the Ne of S. carolitertii (NeC)). TA – divergence from the ancestral; TP – divergence of the northern S. pyrenaicus; TS—secondary contact. Population sizes are not to scale. See Supplementary Fig. S11 for relative likelihoods based on AIC, and Supplementary Tables S5S7 for estimated likelihoods and parameter values.

Back to article page