Table 2 Genetic (below) and phenotypic (above) correlations and the standard error of the compounds that significantly correlated with bark stripping.

From: Additive genetic variation in Pinus radiata bark chemistry and the chemical traits associated with variation in mammalian bark stripping

ID

Traits

Bark stripping

Height

unknown sesquiterpenoid alcohol

unknown m/z 109 B

unknown C20H30O6 D

fructose

glucose

linoleic acid

linolenic acid

unknown m/z 104

 

Height

0.40 (0.29)

 

0.24 (0.04)***

−0.30 (0.05)***

−0.13 (0.04)**

−0.12 (0.00)*

0.36 (0.08)

−0.09 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

−0.23 (0.06)**

19

unknown sesquiterpenoid alcohol

−0.69 (0.22)*

−0.85 (0.22)**

 

−0.27 (0.06)

−0.28 (0.12)***

−0.37 (0.05)***

−0.44 (0.05)***

−0.18 (0.19)***

−0.17 (0.05)**

−0.10 (0.11)

27

unknown m/z 109 B

0.52 (0.24)*

0.77 (0.26)**

−0.29 (0.29)

 

0.59 (0.06)

0.15 (0.09)

0.21 (0.09)

0.34 (0.10)

0.14 (0.08)

0.70 (0.04)***

41

unknown C20H30O6D

0.61 (0.19)**

0.45 (0.26)

−0.15 (0.26)

0.93 (0.06)***

 

0.28 (0.40)

0.41 (0.09)***

0.48 (0.09)***

0.35 (0.09)***

0.84 (0.02)***

54

fructose

0.55 (0.23)*

0.06 (0.31)

−0.06 (0.27)

0.69 (0.23)*

0.64 (0.18)*

 

0.85 (0.03)***

0.07 (0.05)

0.05 (0.05)

0.50 (0.06)***

55

glucose

0.80 (0.20)**

0.62 (0.24)**

−0.19 (0.27)

0.82 (0.20)**

0.85 (0.14)**

0.84 (0.09)***

 

0.07 (0.15)*

0.18 (0.12)***

0.41 (0.07)***

59

linoleic acid

0.68 (0.16)**

0.69 (0.22)***

−0.51 (0.19)*

0.84 (0.12)***

0.59 (0.17)*

0.14 (025)

0.44 (0.23)

 

0.58 (0.06)***

0.30 (0.09)***

60

linolenic acid

0.65 (0.19)**

0.50 (0.26)**

−0.52 (0.21)

0.95 (0.13)***

0.65 (0.16)**

0.12 (026)

0.47 (0.23)

0.97 (0.06)***

 

0.19 (0.08)**

62

unknown m/z 104

0.42 (0.22)*

0.27 (0.28)

0.20 (0.26)

0.79 (0.11)***

0.88 (0.06)***

0.96 (0.08)***

0.90 (0.11)***

0.37 (0.20)

0.55 (0.19)*

 
  1. The phenotypic correlation between bark stripping with the compounds was not estimated since the chemistry was estimated in separate trial replicates from where bark stripping was estimated. Genetic correlation between traits were estimated using the trivariate models that included a chemical trait, height and bark stripping (see ‘Materials and methods’). Unadjusted p-values are indicated, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Unknown indicates a compound that could not be identified. All compounds were given a unique identifier (ID) for ease of identification following Supplementary Table 1.
Back to article page